Re: [O] Using #+NAME for single value, not table?

2014-07-25 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Rainer M Krug wrote: > Aaron Ecay writes: >> 2014ko ekainak 26an, Rainer M Krug-ek idatzi zuen: >>> >>> I use #+NAME to define some parameters for my analysis, which works >>> quite nice for tables. but I would now like to use the same apprioach >>> for values, e.g. a single number, but I don't m

Re: [O] Using #+NAME for single value, not table?

2014-06-30 Thread Rainer M Krug
Aaron Ecay writes: > Hi Rainer, > > 2014ko ekainak 26an, Rainer M Krug-ek idatzi zuen: >> >> Hi >> >> I use #+NAME to define some parameters for my analysis, which works >> quite nice for tables. but I would now like to use the same apprioach >> for values, e.g. a single number, but I don't man

Re: [O] Using #+NAME for single value, not table?

2014-06-27 Thread Grant Rettke
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Aaron Ecay wrote: > You can use a verbatim block: > > , > | #+name: xyz > | : hi > | > | #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var abc=xyz > | (concat "*" abc "*") > | #+end_src > | > | #+RESULTS: > | : *hi* > ` Is that similar to (setq xyz "hi")?

Re: [O] Using #+NAME for single value, not table?

2014-06-27 Thread Aaron Ecay
Hi Rainer, 2014ko ekainak 26an, Rainer M Krug-ek idatzi zuen: > > Hi > > I use #+NAME to define some parameters for my analysis, which works > quite nice for tables. but I would now like to use the same apprioach > for values, e.g. a single number, but I don't manage. Is this possible? > For ill

Re: [O] Using #+NAME for single value, not table?

2014-06-27 Thread Nick Dokos
Rainer M Krug writes: > t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > >> Perhaps you could wrap it in a source code block? > > Thanks - yes, I could do that, but then it is not equivalent to a table, > as I have to use VARIABLEVALUE() and for a table VARIABLETABLE. I > actually wanted to get rid of th

Re: [O] Using #+NAME for single value, not table?

2014-06-27 Thread Rainer M Krug
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Aloha Rainer, > > Rainer M Krug writes: > >> Hi >> >> I use #+NAME to define some parameters for my analysis, which works >> quite nice for tables. but I would now like to use the same apprioach >> for values, e.g. a single number, but I don't manage. Is t

Re: [O] Using #+NAME for single value, not table?

2014-06-26 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Rainer, Rainer M Krug writes: > Hi > > I use #+NAME to define some parameters for my analysis, which works > quite nice for tables. but I would now like to use the same apprioach > for values, e.g. a single number, but I don't manage. Is this possible? > For illustration a short example: >

[O] Using #+NAME for single value, not table?

2014-06-26 Thread Rainer M Krug
Hi I use #+NAME to define some parameters for my analysis, which works quite nice for tables. but I would now like to use the same apprioach for values, e.g. a single number, but I don't manage. Is this possible? For illustration a short example: --8<---cut here---start---