Hi Sam,
thanks for the feedback.
sam kleinman writes:
> Therefore, if having Worg built using org-mode syntax/files is
> important to you, the current solution or some variant thereon is
> probably the best bet...
Yes, having Worg built using org-mode files *is* important.
Best,
--
Bastien
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:10:33AM +0530, Jambunathan K wrote:
> Samuel Wales writes:
>
> > Long shot: is making worg more wiki-like practical?
>
> Worg = Ikiwiki + Org?
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-12/msg00431.html
>
> It wouldn't be a bad idea to ask Ikiwiki folks to
Samuel Wales writes:
> Long shot: is making worg more wiki-like practical?
Worg = Ikiwiki + Org?
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2011-12/msg00431.html
It wouldn't be a bad idea to ask Ikiwiki folks to support Org-mode
natively. I dropped a note to them a few weeks ago, btw.
--
