On Monday 09 March 2015 12:04 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> I'm happy to have you here and look forward to your contributions to Org
> mode. I hope you enjoy the community as much as I do. I think Org mode
> rocks.
Thanks a lot.
Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> On Sunday 08 March 2015 11:04 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>
>> Thankfully, Richard demonstrated to his satisfaction that an
>> off-the-shelf CSL style could be made to handle this situation. If this
>> is the only potential problem you see, then thi
On Sunday 08 March 2015 11:04 PM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Thankfully, Richard demonstrated to his satisfaction that an
> off-the-shelf CSL style could be made to handle this situation. If this
> is the only potential problem you see, then this gives me hope that
> Richard will succeed in implement
Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> On Sunday 08 March 2015 09:29 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>
>> Is your doubt about his eventual success founded in a general
>> skepticism about predicting the future (certainly warranted),
>> or in some particular knowledge about the difficulty of t
On Sunday 08 March 2015 09:29 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Is your doubt about his eventual success founded in a general
> skepticism about predicting the future (certainly warranted),
> or in some particular knowledge about the difficulty of the task?
I have no such doubt or skepticism.
> If the
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> On Sunday 08 March 2015 03:01 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>> Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
>>
>> (Bringing the conversation back on list.)
>>
>> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>>
>>> Richard understood the point I was making. When you have time,
>>> compare how you responded with ho
On Sunday 08 March 2015 03:01 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
>
> (Bringing the conversation back on list.)
>
> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>
>> Richard understood the point I was making. When you have time,
>> compare how you responded with how he responded. You can learn a
>>
Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
(Bringing the conversation back on list.)
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> Richard understood the point I was making. When you have time,
> compare how you responded with how he responded. You can learn a
> thing or two from Richard.
I've learned many things from Richard!
I'
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>> I'm asking because the developers who contribute their effort to Org
>> mode are, IMHO, extremely talented and experienced programmers. IIUC,
>> they are also busy with other projects (some of which hopefully make
>> them some money!), so I think it would help them if
> I'm asking because the developers who contribute their effort to Org
> mode are, IMHO, extremely talented and experienced programmers. IIUC,
> they are also busy with other projects (some of which hopefully make
> them some money!), so I think it would help them if you could document
> the probl
On Saturday 07 March 2015 10:18 PM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
>> (b) producing a csl-based tool that ORG CAN INTERFACE WITH that
>> > produces "in-text" AND "parenthetical" styles.
> Actually, I am working on exactly that. I will post here when I've got
> something to share.
That will be a big
Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> On Friday 06 March 2015 07:27 PM, Rasmus wrote:
>> My interpretation of the text is "if you want 'A (Y)' I will type '(Y)'
>> but you will have to type 'A' — manually(!)".
>
> The details like these are important from design stand of view.
>
> Do
Aloha Vaidheeswaran C,
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>> So there is not really any such thing as an "in-text CSL style".
>> Rather, there are CSL styles that support both in-text and parenthetical
>> citations (which is most of them, I'd guess).
>
> Your guess is just a guess. You haven't looked at c
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> On Friday 06 March 2015 11:51 PM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
>>
>> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>>
>>> I got the subject and also text wrong. (But I hope my intention was
>>> clear.) I am really looking for EXISTING in-text CSL styles.
>>
>> Rasmus pointed you to a relevant
On Friday 06 March 2015 07:27 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> My interpretation of the text is "if you want 'A (Y)' I will type '(Y)'
> but you will have to type 'A' — manually(!)".
The details like these are important from design stand of view.
Do people who are lobbying for integration with CSL tools payin
On Friday 06 March 2015 11:51 PM, Richard Lawrence wrote:
> Hi Vaidheeswaran,
>
> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>
>> I got the subject and also text wrong. (But I hope my intention was
>> clear.) I am really looking for EXISTING in-text CSL styles.
>
> Rasmus pointed you to a relevant style:
>
> ht
Hi Vaidheeswaran,
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> I got the subject and also text wrong. (But I hope my intention was
> clear.) I am really looking for EXISTING in-text CSL styles.
Rasmus pointed you to a relevant style:
https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/chicago-author-d
On Friday 06 March 2015 07:27 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> Last resort you could import all references as org-bibtex entries and use
> some tool to format information from this. It's much nicer to rely on an
> external tool for this, though.
We are talking about 100 options -- JabRef, Citeproc-java, org-b
I think the post-processor type tool is what would give the most
capabilities. The citations produced depends on the context. (For
example, is it a second refernce to an earlier occurrence etc. Is
this an "Ibid" stuff etc.) JabRef and Citeproc-java cannot do that.
My suggestion, people take A
I got the subject and also text wrong. (But I hope my intention was
clear.) I am really looking for EXISTING in-text CSL styles.
On Friday 06 March 2015 07:27 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>
>
>>> Maybe this:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/citation-style-language
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> Does biblatex integrate with CSL engine?
I don't think so.
> I sense a lot of enthusiasm to use CSL styles.
It has good support outside of LaTeX, e.g. Mendely and Zotero.
I'm not sure Bibtex is easily supported on these formats, maybe 'cause
it's a postprocessor, tho
Hi,
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>> Maybe this:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/citation-style-language/styles/blob/master/chicago-author-date.csl
>
> I have looked at this style file and I have even written a CSL macro
> for this file. Please tell me how would I create parenthetical styles
> w
On Friday 06 March 2015 06:59 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>
>> I am approaching this whole thread from a "tools" perspective.
>
> https://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex
> http://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-chicago
> http://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-apa
> http://www.ctan.org/pkg/natbib
>
On Friday 06 March 2015 06:59 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>
>> I am approaching this whole thread from a "tools" perspective.
>
> https://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex
> http://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-chicago
> http://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-apa
> http://www.ctan.org/pkg/natbib
>
On Friday 06 March 2015 06:57 PM, Rasmus wrote:
> Vaidheeswaran C writes:
>
>> I am trying to locate a Zotero csl file that produces parenthetical
>> style -- Author (Date) -- for citations[1]. The primer[2] uses the
>> term "in-text" to refer to what this mailing list has been designating
>> as
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> I am trying to locate a Zotero csl file that produces parenthetical
> style -- Author (Date) -- for citations[1]. The primer[2] uses the
> term "in-text" to refer to what this mailing list has been designating
> as "parenthetical" style.
Author-date a la biblatex have
Vaidheeswaran C writes:
> I am approaching this whole thread from a "tools" perspective.
https://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex
http://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-chicago
http://www.ctan.org/pkg/biblatex-apa
http://www.ctan.org/pkg/natbib
http://www.ctan.org/pkg/chicago
http://www.ctan.org/pkg/harvard
On Friday 06 March 2015 06:33 PM, Vaidheeswaran C wrote:
> I am trying to locate a Zotero csl file that produces parenthetical
> style -- Author (Date) -- for citations[1]. The primer[2] uses the
> term "in-text" to refer to what this mailing list has been designating
> as "parenthetical" style.
>
I am trying to locate a Zotero csl file that produces parenthetical
style -- Author (Date) -- for citations[1]. The primer[2] uses the
term "in-text" to refer to what this mailing list has been designating
as "parenthetical" style.
I want to see an "off-the-shelf" csl style file, that uses
parent
29 matches
Mail list logo
