> >> Org's manual suggests to bind `org-agenda' to `C-c a',
> >> but doesn't bind it by default.
> >
> > I'm not even sure that's a great idea. I think not.
> >
> > I suppose it's "legit", as the user, not the Org code,
> > would be making the binding. But in my libraries I
> > provide binding
Hello,
Drew Adams writes:
>> > Dunno whether there are actual bindings in Org that correspond to these
>> > occurrences in the source code of `C-c' followed by a letter. Might be
>> > worth checking. (Bindings of `C-c' followed by a letter are reserved
>> > for users.)
> > Dunno whether there are actual bindings in Org that correspond to these
> > occurrences in the source code of `C-c' followed by a letter. Might be
> > worth checking. (Bindings of `C-c' followed by a letter are reserved
> > for users.) Possibly these are just vestigial doc indications,
Hello,
Drew Adams writes:
> Dunno whether there are actual bindings in Org that correspond to these
> occurrences in the source code of `C-c' followed by a letter. Might be
> worth checking. (Bindings of `C-c' followed by a letter are reserved
> for users.) Possibly