Re: [O] descriptions about org-cycle is separated
Hi Takaaki, Takaaki ISHIKAWA writes: > It is separated into P.13 and P.14. So, I make a patch, please find it > below. I just jointed the separated descriptions. I see now -- thanks for the patch, I've now applied it! Best, -- Bastien
Re: [O] descriptions about org-cycle is separated
Hi Bastien,
> There are many more occurrences of this notion
Yes! you are right. But I didn't mean it.
A comment from Bernt describes more clearly.
> The key is listed twice on that page which I think feels a little
> weird.
It is separated into P.13 and P.14. So, I make a patch, please find it below.
I just jointed the separated descriptions.
Best regards,
Takaaki
--- a/doc/org.texi
+++ b/doc/org.texi
@@ -1651,6 +1651,10 @@ the cursor is on a plain list item. For more details,
see the variable
headlines. The level of an item is then given by the
indentation of the bullet/number. Items are always subordinate to real
headlines, however; the hierarchies remain completely separated.
+In a new item with no text yet, the first @key{TAB} demotes the item to
+become a child of the previous one. Subsequent @key{TAB}s move the item to
+meaningful levels in the list and eventually get it back to its initial
+position.
@orgcmd{M-@key{RET},org-insert-heading}
@vindex org-M-RET-may-split-line
@vindex org-list-automatic-rules
@@ -1664,11 +1668,6 @@ one.
@kindex M-S-@key{RET}
@item M-S-@key{RET}
Insert a new item with a checkbox (@pxref{Checkboxes}).
-@orgcmd{@key{TAB},org-cycle}
-In a new item with no text yet, the first @key{TAB} demotes the item to
-become a child of the previous one. Subsequent @key{TAB}s move the item to
-meaningful levels in the list and eventually get it back to its initial
-position.
@kindex S-@key{down}
@item S-@key{up}
@itemx S-@key{down}
Re: [O] descriptions about org-cycle is separated
Bastien writes: > Dear Takaaki, > > Takaaki ISHIKAWA writes: > >> Descriptions about org-cycle is separated in the >> Org manual, section 2.7. >> >> http://orgmode.org/manual/Plain-lists.html#Plain-lists >> >> Is there any reason for this? > > This isolated occurrence of `org-cycle' is about cycling > in plain lists. There are many more occurrences of this > notion -- typing `i' in the info manual then `cycling TAB' > lead at least to two references. > > And org-cycle is mostly documented in `Visibility cycling' > so I think things are fine here. But please provide a patch > with a fix, perhaps I misunderstood what you suggestion! The key is listed twice on that page which I think feels a little weird. Regards, Bernt
Re: [O] descriptions about org-cycle is separated
Dear Takaaki, Takaaki ISHIKAWA writes: > Descriptions about org-cycle is separated in the > Org manual, section 2.7. > > http://orgmode.org/manual/Plain-lists.html#Plain-lists > > Is there any reason for this? This isolated occurrence of `org-cycle' is about cycling in plain lists. There are many more occurrences of this notion -- typing `i' in the info manual then `cycling TAB' lead at least to two references. And org-cycle is mostly documented in `Visibility cycling' so I think things are fine here. But please provide a patch with a fix, perhaps I misunderstood what you suggestion! Thanks, -- Bastien
Re: [O] descriptions about org-cycle is separated
Takaaki ISHIKAWA writes: > Descriptions about org-cycle is separated in the > Org manual, section 2.7. > > http://orgmode.org/manual/Plain-lists.html#Plain-lists > > Is there any reason for this? Not that I know of. They should probably be merged into a single entry. Regards, Bernt
[O] descriptions about org-cycle is separated
Dear all, Descriptions about org-cycle is separated in the Org manual, section 2.7. http://orgmode.org/manual/Plain-lists.html#Plain-lists Is there any reason for this? Best regards, Takaaki Ishikawa
