Re: [O] format of the ID property in the new HTML exporter

2013-02-13 Thread Bastien
Hi Florian, Florian Beck f...@miszellen.de writes: Yes. Why do you need the assert? It only seems to be there to make my life more difficult. I've remove the (assert ...) sexp, which was too strict, I agree. Thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] format of the ID property in the new HTML exporter

2013-02-12 Thread Florian Beck
Jambunathan K kjambunat...@gmail.com writes: There is ID and then there is CUSTOM_ID. IIUC/IIRC, ID is a uuid and CUSTOM_ID can be whatever. Any reason why you cannot use CUSTOM_IDs here? Yes. Why do you need the assert? It only seems to be there to make my life more difficult. -- Florian

Re: [O] format of the ID property in the new HTML exporter

2013-02-11 Thread Jambunathan K
Daniel Clemente n142...@gmail.com writes: Hi, in ox-html.el there's a line with an assert (the only one): (assert (org-uuidgen-p path)) 1. I have some IDs like o5y98600aze0 which don't conform to that uuidgen format; they were created by early versions of org. Should only

[O] format of the ID property in the new HTML exporter

2013-02-09 Thread Daniel Clemente
Hi, in ox-html.el there's a line with an assert (the only one): (assert (org-uuidgen-p path)) 1. I have some IDs like o5y98600aze0 which don't conform to that uuidgen format; they were created by early versions of org. Should only UUIDs be accepted as ID? 2. I think the ID