Julius Dittmar writes:
> Hi Ruda,
>
> Am 10.12.18 um 11:32 schrieb Rudolf Sykora:
>> is there a way to *temporalily* disable the default interpretation
>> of _ as a subscript?
>>
>> I use filenames which include _ ,
>
> how about enclosing those filenames in a pair of = signs to mark the
> fil
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 5:34 AM Rudolf Sykora wrote:
>
> Dear list,
>
> is there a way to *temporalily* disable the default interpretation
> of _ as a subscript?
>
> I use filenames which include _ , while I have
> many other places where I want the default behaviour
> (I don't want to rewrite the
Hi Ruda,
Am 10.12.18 um 11:32 schrieb Rudolf Sykora:
> is there a way to *temporalily* disable the default interpretation
> of _ as a subscript?
>
> I use filenames which include _ ,
how about enclosing those filenames in a pair of = signs to mark the
filename itself as text to be passed through
Dear list,
is there a way to *temporalily* disable the default interpretation
of _ as a subscript?
I use filenames which include _ , while I have
many other places where I want the default behaviour
(I don't want to rewrite these with explicit {} and changing
org-use-sub-superscripts variable to
