John Hendy writes:
> Does this make sense? If so, this is my reasoning for thinking the
> change has to be on the org side. Alternatively, an openssl decryption
> method could be integrated into mobileorg Android.
What I meant was that it would be nice if there were a single scheme to
encrypt o
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> It seems that the android version should act like the ios version and
> just use the symmetric cipher. Is that hard, or is there some advantage
> to the gpg scheme? Or perhaps the android-style encryption should be
> supported directly in
It seems that the android version should act like the ios version and
just use the symmetric cipher. Is that hard, or is there some advantage
to the gpg scheme? Or perhaps the android-style encryption should be
supported directly in org?
pgpZvBw3Y611F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
See this thread on the Android mobileorg mailing list for reference:
- https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mobileorg-android/IELoLsOCvos
I was having issues with org-mobile-use-encryption, and think it ended
up being that this variable is only for the iOS version. It encrypts
with openssl (at
