Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-07 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: I just looked at the footnote text... why did we go from symlinks work if the name is the same to an unqualified symlinks are not supported? Should be fixed now... thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-06 Thread James Harkins
On Jan 4, 2013 11:34 PM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote: Hi James, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: The outcome is the same as the first: document the issue. Org is yours :) I worked in software support for awhile, so... I know what it means, e.g., when some behavior is labeled

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-06 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: I'm not sure of the procedure to contribute to the org manual, but I might suggest something like this, under MobileOrg section B2: I added a footnote: http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=76684b5 Thanks! -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-06 Thread James Harkins
On Jan 6, 2013 9:57 PM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote: Hi James, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: I'm not sure of the procedure to contribute to the org manual, but I might suggest something like this, under MobileOrg section B2: I added a footnote:

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-06 Thread Bastien
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: I just looked at the footnote text... why did we go from symlinks work if the name is the same to an unqualified symlinks are not supported? I overlooked the difference. Please provide a patch. ~$ git clone git://orgmode.org/org-mode.git ~$ emacs

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-04 Thread James Harkins
On Jan 3, 2013 8:57 PM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote: Hi James, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: - One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an intentional limitation, it should be

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-04 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: The outcome is the same as the first: document the issue. Org is yours :) -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2013-01-03 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: - One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an intentional limitation, it should be documented. - Or, the symlink resolution is not actually necessary

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2012-12-19 Thread J. David Boyd
Bastien b...@altern.org writes: James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda files' names to symlink targets? The problem is that there is no active maintainer on

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2012-12-19 Thread Bastien
Hi David, da...@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) writes: How would we do that? Are there instructions somewhere on the proper way to create a patch file for this? The proper mode for diff? What has to be in a changelog? There are a few changes I'd like to see in mobile.el myself, and I'm

[O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2012-12-15 Thread James Harkins
Sorry for resending as a new thread. I had wanted to reply to my original message on gmane, but gmane's search fails to locate the thread (?). Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda files' names to symlink

Re: [O] org-mobile-push vs. symlinks

2012-12-15 Thread Bastien
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes: Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda files' names to symlink targets? The problem is that there is no active maintainer on org-mobile.el right now... by