Hi James,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
I just looked at the footnote text... why did we go from symlinks
work if the name is the same to an unqualified symlinks are not
supported?
Should be fixed now... thanks,
--
Bastien
On Jan 4, 2013 11:34 PM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Hi James,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
The outcome is the same as the first: document the issue.
Org is yours :)
I worked in software support for awhile, so... I know what it means, e.g.,
when some behavior is labeled
Hi James,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure of the procedure to contribute to the org manual, but I
might suggest something like this, under MobileOrg section B2:
I added a footnote:
http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/commit/?id=76684b5
Thanks!
--
Bastien
On Jan 6, 2013 9:57 PM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Hi James,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
I'm not sure of the procedure to contribute to the org manual, but I
might suggest something like this, under MobileOrg section B2:
I added a footnote:
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
I just looked at the footnote text... why did we go from symlinks
work if the name is the same to an unqualified symlinks are not
supported?
I overlooked the difference.
Please provide a patch.
~$ git clone git://orgmode.org/org-mode.git
~$ emacs
On Jan 3, 2013 8:57 PM, Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Hi James,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
- One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make
sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an
intentional limitation, it should be
Hi James,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
The outcome is the same as the first: document the issue.
Org is yours :)
--
Bastien
Hi James,
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
- One should not put symlinks into org-directory, or at least make
sure the symlink's name is the same as the target. If this is an
intentional limitation, it should be documented.
- Or, the symlink resolution is not actually necessary
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current
behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda
files' names to symlink targets?
The problem is that there is no active maintainer on
Hi David,
da...@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) writes:
How would we do that? Are there instructions somewhere on the proper
way to create a patch file for this? The proper mode for diff? What
has to be in a changelog?
There are a few changes I'd like to see in mobile.el myself, and I'm
Sorry for resending as a new thread. I had wanted to reply to my
original message on gmane, but gmane's search fails to locate the
thread (?).
Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current
behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda
files' names to symlink
James Harkins jamshar...@gmail.com writes:
Anyway, I still don't understand the rationale for the current
behavior. Does anyone know why org-mobile-push resolves the agenda
files' names to symlink targets?
The problem is that there is no active maintainer on org-mobile.el
right now... by
12 matches
Mail list logo