[O] org-schedule vs org-time-stamp
I'm not clear on how these two are intended to be used. The former prefixes the timestamp with SCHEDULED: but I'm not sure what practical consequences this has. Items appear in the agenda either way.
Re: [O] org-schedule vs org-time-stamp
Paul Rudin, Paul Rudin wrote: I'm not clear on how these two are intended to be used. The former prefixes the timestamp with SCHEDULED: but I'm not sure what practical consequences this has. Items appear in the agenda either way. You should absolutely read the chapter 8 (Dates and Times) of the Org manual. In summary, active timestamps only will appear on the day of the timestamp. It's good for meetings or birthdays or events that naturally only occur at a certain day. SCHEDULED timestamps indicate when you want to start working on a task. Such items will appear every day, on and on, in your agenda until you mark them done. Best regards, Seb -- Sebastien Vauban
Re: [O] org-schedule vs org-time-stamp
Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com writes: Paul Rudin, Paul Rudin wrote: I'm not clear on how these two are intended to be used. The former prefixes the timestamp with SCHEDULED: but I'm not sure what practical consequences this has. Items appear in the agenda either way. You should absolutely read the chapter 8 (Dates and Times) of the Org manual. In summary, active timestamps only will appear on the day of the timestamp. It's good for meetings or birthdays or events that naturally only occur at a certain day. SCHEDULED timestamps indicate when you want to start working on a task. Such items will appear every day, on and on, in your agenda until you mark them done. Ah yes, I see. Thanks.
