Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

On 8.5.2013, at 00:14, Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Bastien, On 5/7/13, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: IMHO this would be too much, since the let-binding solution is there already. I won't object to whatever decision is made, but it made me curious: is it not there for

Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

Hi Samuel, Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes: However, the COMMENT keyword on a headline stops results from showing. This is not desired. It is also inconsistent with commented lines. I strongly prefer for all matches to show up, whether commented or not. However, in principle

Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

Bastien wrote: Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes: However, the COMMENT keyword on a headline stops results from showing. This is not desired. It is also inconsistent with commented lines. I strongly prefer for all matches to show up, whether commented or not. However, in principle

Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org writes: Isn't here the problem that the OP makes a difference between agenda generation and results for a search. I guess he agrees COMMENTed trees should not participate in agendas, but well in regexp searches. But Samuel

Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

Bastien wrote: Sebastien Vauban writes: Isn't here the problem that the OP makes a difference between agenda generation and results for a search. I guess he agrees COMMENTed trees should not participate in agendas, but well in regexp searches. But Samuel *is* using the agenda, no? I

Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

On 7 mei 2013, at 14:39, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: Sebastien Vauban sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/idocf...@public.gmane.org writes: Isn't here the problem that the OP makes a difference between agenda generation and results for a search. I guess he agrees COMMENTed trees should not

Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

Hi Sebastien, On 5/7/13, Sebastien Vauban sva-n...@mygooglest.com wrote: I understand, maybe wrongly though, that he agrees not seeing COMMENTed headlines in C-c a a, but not in C-c a s results. He'll tell us... Yes, that is correct, thank you. (There is also the apparent inconsistency

Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

Hi Samuel, Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes: Ideally, the variable would allow a list of search types (along the lines of org-agenda-use-tag-inheritance). I wonder if that would make sense? IMHO this would be too much, since the let-binding solution is there already. -- Bastien

Re: [O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

Hi Bastien, On 5/7/13, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote: IMHO this would be too much, since the let-binding solution is there already. I won't object to whatever decision is made, but it made me curious: is it not there for inheritance? This raises another question. Is it possible to do a let for

[O] org-search-view skips over commented subtrees

When I search for a {regexp}, using the agenda, with restriction set to the current file, I get entries that contain matching text in ordinary lines and entries that contain matching text in commented lines. This is desired. However, the COMMENT keyword on a headline stops results from showing.