Indeed, this seems to do the trick!
Thanks!
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Ista Zahn istaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't you just do
#+begin_src foo :wrap src bar
hello world
#+end_src
?
Best,
Ista
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah dror...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there
Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the
language of the result?
Cheers,
Dror
--
Mahalo Tom,
It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it
would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language
specification.
Can't you just do
#+begin_src foo :wrap src bar
hello world
#+end_src
?
Best,
Ista
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah dror...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the
language of the result?
Cheers,
Dror
--
Mahalo
I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able to have
the #+RESULTS block enclosed
in a src block that starts #+BEGIN_SRC dot. Using :results value code
generates the enclosing SRC block,
but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is there a way
to
Greg Tucker-Kellogg gtuckerkell...@gmail.com writes:
I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able
to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed
in a src block that starts #+BEGIN_SRC dot. Using :results value
code generates the enclosing SRC block,
but using the same language
Mahalo Tom,
It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it
would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language
specification.
Greg
On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
Greg Tucker-Kellogg gtuckerkell...@gmail.com writes:
I have a
