Re: [O] specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code source block
Indeed, this seems to do the trick! Thanks! On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Ista Zahn wrote: > Can't you just do > > #+begin_src foo :wrap src bar >hello world > #+end_src > > ? > > Best, > Ista > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah wrote: > > Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the > > language of the result? > > > > Cheers, > > Dror > > > > -- > > Mahalo Tom, > > > > It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, > it > > would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language > > specification. > > > > Greg > > > > > > On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > > > >> Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes: > >> > >>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able > >>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed > >>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value > >>> code generates the enclosing SRC block, > >>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is > >>> there a way to specify the coding language > >>> of a generated #+RESULTS src block? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Greg > >>> > >> Aloha Greg, > >> > >> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that > >> generates dot code. > >> > >> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix > >> #+header: :file temp.pdf > >> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf > >> #+header: :results output > >> #+BEGIN_SRC dot > >> $input > >> #+END_SRC > >> > >> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help? > >> > >> All the best, > >> Tom > >> > >> -- > >> Thomas S. Dye > >> http://www.tsdye.com >
Re: [O] specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code source block
Can't you just do #+begin_src foo :wrap src bar hello world #+end_src ? Best, Ista On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Dror Atariah wrote: > Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the > language of the result? > > Cheers, > Dror > > -- > Mahalo Tom, > > It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it > would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language > specification. > > Greg > > > On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > >> Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes: >> >>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able >>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed >>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value >>> code generates the enclosing SRC block, >>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is >>> there a way to specify the coding language >>> of a generated #+RESULTS src block? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Greg >>> >> Aloha Greg, >> >> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that >> generates dot code. >> >> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix >> #+header: :file temp.pdf >> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf >> #+header: :results output >> #+BEGIN_SRC dot >> $input >> #+END_SRC >> >> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help? >> >> All the best, >> Tom >> >> -- >> Thomas S. Dye >> http://www.tsdye.com
Re: [O] specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code source block
Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the language of the result? Cheers, Dror -- Mahalo Tom, It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language specification. Greg On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes: > >> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able >> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed >> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value >> code generates the enclosing SRC block, >> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is >> there a way to specify the coding language >> of a generated #+RESULTS src block? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Greg >> > Aloha Greg, > > This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that > generates dot code. > > #+header: :var input=harris-matrix > #+header: :file temp.pdf > #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf > #+header: :results output > #+BEGIN_SRC dot > $input > #+END_SRC > > It's not quite what you were after, but it might help? > > All the best, > Tom > > -- > Thomas S. Dye > http://www.tsdye.com
Re: [O] specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code source block
Mahalo Tom, It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language specification. Greg On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote: > Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes: > >> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able >> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed >> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value >> code generates the enclosing SRC block, >> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is >> there a way to specify the coding language >> of a generated #+RESULTS src block? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Greg >> > Aloha Greg, > > This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that > generates dot code. > > #+header: :var input=harris-matrix > #+header: :file temp.pdf > #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf > #+header: :results output > #+BEGIN_SRC dot > $input > #+END_SRC > > It's not quite what you were after, but it might help? > > All the best, > Tom > > -- > Thomas S. Dye > http://www.tsdye.com signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
Re: [O] specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code source block
Greg Tucker-Kellogg writes: > I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able > to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed > in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value > code generates the enclosing SRC block, > but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is > there a way to specify the coding language > of a generated #+RESULTS src block? > > Thanks, > > Greg > Aloha Greg, This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that generates dot code. #+header: :var input=harris-matrix #+header: :file temp.pdf #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf #+header: :results output #+BEGIN_SRC dot $input #+END_SRC It's not quite what you were after, but it might help? All the best, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
[O] specifying the coding language resulting from a a :results code source block
I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value code generates the enclosing SRC block, but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is there a way to specify the coding language of a generated #+RESULTS src block? Thanks, Greg signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail