Re: [O] was this intentional with the default header :results value
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: Or, fiddling a bit more. #+name: luo #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output raw library(ascii) df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789000,c2=2) df$c1 - as.vector(df$c1) print(ascii(df,digits=c(0,0),include.rownames=F),type=org) #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: luo |c1 | c2 | |---+| | 123456789123456789000 | 2 | Thanks for your help in time, it works like in a charm.
[O] was this intentional with the default header :results value
Hi, Why in the following code block, c1 was printed as scientific notation rather then characters. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results value | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | | 1.2345678912345678e+17 | 2 | ` But if the header :results output, the result was expected. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | df | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | : c1 c2 | : 1 123456789123456789 2 ` Thanks
Re: [O] was this intentional with the default header :results value
Aloha Eric, Eric Luo eric.we...@gmail.com writes: Hi, Why in the following code block, c1 was printed as scientific notation rather then characters. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results value | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | | 1.2345678912345678e+17 | 2 | ` With :results value the results are passed from the source language into emacs-lisp and then displayed in the buffer. So, the representation of things like very large numbers depends on how that was done in emacs-lisp, independent of the source language conventions. In this case, I suspect the number was written with a formatting string and ‘%g’ which uses scientific notation if that is a shorter representation. But if the header :results output, the result was expected. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | df | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | : c1 c2 | : 1 123456789123456789 2 ` With :results output the results aren't translated into emacs-lisp. Instead, the output from the source language is collected and displayed in the buffer. Thus, the output conventions of the source language are respected. hth, Tom -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
Re: [O] was this intentional with the default header :results value
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: Thanks, it's clear to me with the difference between value and output now. whether there is a way to tell emacs-lisp that 123456789123456789 is a string rather than a number. emacs-lisp handles the output as expected if the c1 has any character other than numbers as the following. , | #+BEGIN_SRC R | df - data.frame(c1=c123456789123456789,c2=2) | df$c1 - as.vector(df$c1) | df | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | | c123456789123456789 | 2 | | ` Aloha Eric, Eric Luo eric.we...@gmail.com writes: Hi, Why in the following code block, c1 was printed as scientific notation rather then characters. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results value | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | | 1.2345678912345678e+17 | 2 | ` With :results value the results are passed from the source language into emacs-lisp and then displayed in the buffer. So, the representation of things like very large numbers depends on how that was done in emacs-lisp, independent of the source language conventions. In this case, I suspect the number was written with a formatting string and ‘%g’ which uses scientific notation if that is a shorter representation. But if the header :results output, the result was expected. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | df | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | : c1 c2 | : 1 123456789123456789 2 ` With :results output the results aren't translated into emacs-lisp. Instead, the output from the source language is collected and displayed in the buffer. Thus, the output conventions of the source language are respected. hth,
Re: [O] was this intentional with the default header :results value
Hi Eric, I don't know any way to do this in Org-mode. Here is a workaround in R that might do what you want. #+name: luo #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output org library(ascii) df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789000,c2=2) df$c1 - as.vector(df$c1) print(ascii(df),type=org) #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: luo #+BEGIN_ORG | | c1| c2 | |---+---+--| | 1 | 123456789123456789000 | 2.00 | #+END_ORG All the best, Tom Eric Luo eric.we...@gmail.com writes: t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: Thanks, it's clear to me with the difference between value and output now. whether there is a way to tell emacs-lisp that 123456789123456789 is a string rather than a number. emacs-lisp handles the output as expected if the c1 has any character other than numbers as the following. , | #+BEGIN_SRC R | df - data.frame(c1=c123456789123456789,c2=2) | df$c1 - as.vector(df$c1) | df | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | | c123456789123456789 | 2 | | ` Aloha Eric, Eric Luo eric.we...@gmail.com writes: Hi, Why in the following code block, c1 was printed as scientific notation rather then characters. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results value | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | | 1.2345678912345678e+17 | 2 | ` With :results value the results are passed from the source language into emacs-lisp and then displayed in the buffer. So, the representation of things like very large numbers depends on how that was done in emacs-lisp, independent of the source language conventions. In this case, I suspect the number was written with a formatting string and ‘%g’ which uses scientific notation if that is a shorter representation. But if the header :results output, the result was expected. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | df | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | : c1 c2 | : 1 123456789123456789 2 ` With :results output the results aren't translated into emacs-lisp. Instead, the output from the source language is collected and displayed in the buffer. Thus, the output conventions of the source language are respected. hth, -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
Re: [O] was this intentional with the default header :results value
Or, fiddling a bit more. #+name: luo #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output raw library(ascii) df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789000,c2=2) df$c1 - as.vector(df$c1) print(ascii(df,digits=c(0,0),include.rownames=F),type=org) #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: luo |c1 | c2 | |---+| | 123456789123456789000 | 2 | t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: Hi Eric, I don't know any way to do this in Org-mode. Here is a workaround in R that might do what you want. #+name: luo #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output org library(ascii) df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789000,c2=2) df$c1 - as.vector(df$c1) print(ascii(df),type=org) #+END_SRC #+RESULTS: luo #+BEGIN_ORG | | c1| c2 | |---+---+--| | 1 | 123456789123456789000 | 2.00 | #+END_ORG All the best, Tom Eric Luo eric.we...@gmail.com writes: t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: Thanks, it's clear to me with the difference between value and output now. whether there is a way to tell emacs-lisp that 123456789123456789 is a string rather than a number. emacs-lisp handles the output as expected if the c1 has any character other than numbers as the following. , | #+BEGIN_SRC R | df - data.frame(c1=c123456789123456789,c2=2) | df$c1 - as.vector(df$c1) | df | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | | c123456789123456789 | 2 | | ` Aloha Eric, Eric Luo eric.we...@gmail.com writes: Hi, Why in the following code block, c1 was printed as scientific notation rather then characters. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results value | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | | 1.2345678912345678e+17 | 2 | ` With :results value the results are passed from the source language into emacs-lisp and then displayed in the buffer. So, the representation of things like very large numbers depends on how that was done in emacs-lisp, independent of the source language conventions. In this case, I suspect the number was written with a formatting string and ‘%g’ which uses scientific notation if that is a shorter representation. But if the header :results output, the result was expected. , | | #+BEGIN_SRC R :results output | df - data.frame(c1=123456789123456789,c2=2) | df | #+END_SRC | | #+RESULTS: | : c1 c2 | : 1 123456789123456789 2 ` With :results output the results aren't translated into emacs-lisp. Instead, the output from the source language is collected and displayed in the buffer. Thus, the output conventions of the source language are respected. hth, -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com
