On Saturday, 24 Mar 2018 at 17:23, Samuel Wales wrote:
> it looks much better now. i think the main thing i would want is to
> color links differently from the default red box, like maybe color the
> text "#8968cd" and underline it so it looks kind of like a web page.
You can specify settings to
i find that the following does not take effect the first time, but
works the second time. not sure why that would be.
it looks much better now. i think the main thing i would want is to
color links differently from the default red box, like maybe color the
text "#8968cd" and underline it so it l
On Sunday, 18 Mar 2018 at 21:41, Samuel Wales wrote:
> On 3/13/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Could you post a minimal example that illustrates this?
>
> here is the minimal example. [btw, it turns out that pandoc erros
> now, so i have to either get your direct export code to work, or fix
> pandoc's
[never mind the comment below.. if i use \\ instead of \, it doesn't
error, but produces default packages on the first page. then the
document starts on the second page.]
On 3/18/18, Samuel Wales wrote:
> On 3/13/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Could you post a minimal example that illustrates this
On 3/13/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Could you post a minimal example that illustrates this?
here is the minimal example. [btw, it turns out that pandoc erros
now, so i have to either get your direct export code to work, or fix
pandoc's export.]
*** NEXTKA fixing pdf to have better paragra
On Monday, 12 Mar 2018 at 16:42, Samuel Wales wrote:
> seems to work. the only thing is that the first page is blank with
> "[DEFAULT-PACKAGES] on it. i tried commenting that part out and got a
> blank page. i presume this is because i am using maint and not
> master. again thanks.
Could you p
seems to work. the only thing is that the first page is blank with
"[DEFAULT-PACKAGES] on it. i tried commenting that part out and got a
blank page. i presume this is because i am using maint and not
master. again thanks.
thank you.
i will try it.
On Friday, 9 Mar 2018 at 17:30, Samuel Wales wrote:
> On 3/9/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Type C-h v org-latex-classes RET for the full description. The
>> header-string can include those particular indent and skip settings
>> along with other bits.
>
> i consulted the docstring and the manual. t
On 3/9/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Type C-h v org-latex-classes RET for the full description. The
> header-string can include those particular indent and skip settings
> along with other bits.
i consulted the docstring and the manual. the description was greek
to me and there was no reference to
On Friday, 9 Mar 2018 at 13:26, Samuel Wales wrote:
[...]
> in any case, greek to me. this was my best guess.
>
> (with-eval-after-load
> (add-to-list org-latex-classes
> '("org-latex" "\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{6pt}")))
No, this won't work. You need to check the documen
On 3/8/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> On Thursday, 8 Mar 2018 at 12:55, Samuel Wales wrote:
>> On 3/3/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>>> #+latex_header: \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{6pt}
>> are there settings in .emacs that will do the same thing?
>
> Yes, you can put such commands in th
On Thursday, 8 Mar 2018 at 12:55, Samuel Wales wrote:
> On 3/3/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> #+latex_header: \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{6pt}
>>
>> might give you "unbunched" "unindented" paragraphs.
>
> thank you. i will try that when i can.
>
> are there settings in .emacs tha
On 3/3/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> #+latex_header: \setlength{\parindent}{0pt}\setlength{\parskip}{6pt}
>
> might give you "unbunched" "unindented" paragraphs.
thank you. i will try that when i can.
are there settings in .emacs that will do the same thing?
> A table of contents will probably onl
On Friday, 2 Mar 2018 at 11:53, Samuel Wales wrote:
> On 3/2/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Why can you not use any LaTeX settings? Org has very extensive support
>> for allowing tweaking of the formatting.
>
> delighted to learn of settings.
So, I am not sure what it is you want to do but maybe a
I have also found that exporting to a .texi file (using ox-texinfo) and then
using texi2pdf to generate a PDF produces, out of the box, a nicer-looking
(IMO) document than the native LaTeX export.
—Diego
> On 2 Mar 2018, at 19:53, Samuel Wales wrote:
>
> On 3/2/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>> Wh
On 3/2/18, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Why can you not use any LaTeX settings? Org has very extensive support
> for allowing tweaking of the formatting.
delighted to learn of settings.
On Thursday, 1 Mar 2018 at 16:09, Samuel Wales wrote:
> mostly ooc because pandoc looks good.
>
> but when i export a subtree [using recent maint] to pdf i get
> paragraphs that are indented and bunched up, and a table of contents
> is missing, and dunno what else. maybe a quote is not set off or
i didn't specify that what looks good to me is org export to html, to
regular pandoc to pdf. congratulations to the html exporter people
and the pandoc people.
On 3/1/18, Samuel Wales wrote:
> mostly ooc because pandoc looks good.
>
> but when i export a subtree [using recent maint] to pdf i get
mostly ooc because pandoc looks good.
but when i export a subtree [using recent maint] to pdf i get
paragraphs that are indented and bunched up, and a table of contents
is missing, and dunno what else. maybe a quote is not set off or
something like that.
just wondering if anybody has settings or
20 matches
Mail list logo
