it must be an XEmacs
issue.
Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix
(XEmacs incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:
Hi Richard, I don't see why this would be necessary? Under what
circumstances does this fail?
- Carsten
On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard
)))
org-clock-history)
(org-fit-window-to-buffer)
Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs
incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:
Hi Richard, I ave fixed this in a different way. Please verify!
- Carsten
On Dec 2, 2009, at 1:32 PM
)))
+ (if (fboundp 'int-to-char) (setf (car s) (int-to-char
(car s
(push s sel-list)))
org-clock-history)
(org-fit-window-to-buffer)
Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix
(XEmacs incompatibility)'; Carsten Dominik adds:
Hi Richard, I
)
((eq rpl ?x) nil)
((assoc rpl sel-list) (cdr (assoc rpl sel-list)))
(t (error Invalid task choice %c rpl)))
I hope you see what the problem is, I think it must be an XEmacs issue.
Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] [PATCH] org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs
incompatibility)'; Carsten
See attached simple patch.
From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Klinda rkli...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 21:03:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] org-clock: org-clock-select-task bugfix (XEmacs)
---
lisp/org-clock.el |4
1 files changed, 4
Hi Richard,
I don't see why this would be necessary? Under what circumstances
does this fail?
- Carsten
On Dec 1, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Richard KLINDA wrote:
See attached simple patch.
From 795d529d622f509f47c2bf17a0139fbe1659cc5f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Klinda
