On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
With three choices for choosenness, it works as I expected (only one
item in CHOSEN state at a time) but for more choices like:
#+CHOOSE_TODO: REJECTED(r) NOT_CHOSEN(n,-) MAYBE(,0)
LEANING_TOWARDS(l) CHOSEN(c,+)
it allows multiple
Tom Breton (Tehom) te...@panix.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
(let*
((x 1))
(eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
x)
=3D 2
(let*
((x 1))
(eval-after-load 'simple '(setq x 2))
x)
=3D 1
In fact, I am getting 2
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
I couldn't reproduce this. Is this on the same test file as before?
Sorry for the delay in reply, Tom. I reproduce the situation below:
First the test file.
--8---cut here---start-8---
Tom Breton (Tehom) te...@panix.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
(let*
((x 1))
(eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
x)
=3D 2
(let*
((x 1))
(eval-after-load 'simple '(setq x 2))
x)
=3D 1
In fact, I am getting 2
Here is a patch that I hope will solve the problems people are having with
org-choose.el. It contains two intended fixes:
* `eval-after-load' gets a string argument. Apparently some emacsen can
accept a symbol, but older ones can't.
* org-agenda is required before `org-map-entries' is called.
Tom Breton (Tehom) te...@panix.com wrote:
What version is this? Because that's clearly not what it does on emacs
21.3.1. Here simple.el does not have (provide 'simple) in it.
I see no provision for accepting a symbol in eval-after-load. The test it
uses is just:
(assoc file
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
I couldn't reproduce this. Is this on the same test file as before?
Sorry for the delay in reply, Tom. I reproduce the situation below:
First the test file.
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Here is a patch that I hope will solve the problems people are having with
org-choose.el. It contains two intended fixes:
* `eval-after-load' gets a string argument. Apparently some emacsen can
accept a symbol, but older ones can't.
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
On Feb 11, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Hmm, not sure if I messed up there - so I fixed this bug. Tom,
please check if I did this right.
- Carsten
Hi, Carsten. I just looked at org-6.22b
You caught a problem, but I think it's a different bug. I think there
are these
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
Carsten Dominik domi...@science.uva.nl writes:
Hi Tom,
maybe you can educate me: I have never understood what the # does
in code like the one you have here. You are using it, so maybe you know?
Since I am always having questions like that, I keep writing here each new
notation I find
Useful resource!
Thanks.
- Carsten
On Feb 11, 2009, at 4:38 PM, Daniel Clemente wrote:
Carsten Dominik domi...@science.uva.nl writes:
Hi Tom,
maybe you can educate me: I have never understood what the # does
in code like the one you have here. You are using it, so maybe you
know?
Hi Tom,
maybe you can educate me: I have never understood what the # does
in code like the one you have here. You are using it, so maybe you
know?
- Carsten
Here, it's #' that it of interest, not # alone.
At the most direct level, it quotes the symbol with `function' instead of
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
This bug is simple. In Setting it all up at the end of org-
choose.el,
in 6.22b a quote got introduced before progn. That's all. With that
quote, it evaluated a quoted form and did nothing. I'd send a
patch,
but ISTM it's easier
On Feb 11, 2009, at 10:41 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
This bug is simple. In Setting it all up at the end of org-
choose.el,
in 6.22b a quote got introduced before progn. That's all. With
that
quote, it evaluated a quoted form
On Feb 11, 2009, at 9:02 PM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
Hi Tom,
maybe you can educate me: I have never understood what the # does
in code like the one you have here. You are using it, so maybe you
know?
- Carsten
Here, it's #' that it of interest, not # alone.
At the most direct
nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Tom Breton (Tehom) te...@panix.com wrote:
(let*
((x 1))
(eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
x)
=3D 2
(let*
((x 1))
(eval-after-load 'simple '(setq x 2))
x)
=3D 1
Are you sure about this? My understanding of this differs from
On Feb 11, 2009, at 2:08 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
(let*
((x 1))
(eval-after-load 'simple (setq x 2))
x)
= 2
(let*
((x 1))
(eval-after-load 'simple '(setq x 2))
x)
= 1
In fact, I am getting 2 in both cases!???
Do you really get 1 for the second???
Yes
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are attached.
This is very intriguing functionality. I tried to follow your and Casten's
earlier exchanges but
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are attached.
This is very intriguing functionality. I tried to follow your and
Casten's
earlier exchanges
With three choices for choosenness, it works as I expected (only one item
in
CHOSEN state at a time) but for more choices like:
#+CHOOSE_TODO: REJECTED(r) NOT_CHOSEN(n,-) MAYBE(,0)
LEANING_TOWARDS(l) CHOSEN(c,+)
it allows multiple items to be in CHOSEN state. How do we interpret that?
I
Hmm, not sure if I messed up there - so I fixed this bug. Tom,
please check if I did this right.
- Carsten
Hi, Carsten. I just looked at org-6.22b
You caught a problem, but I think it's a different bug. I think there
are these different things:
* What you saw, that it doesn't work at
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Feb 10, 2009, at 9:46 AM, Manish wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
[...]
OK, I've add comments, keywords, and some docstrings I forgot to
org-choose.el, and I wrote a standalone doc. Both are
Hi, Carsten.
Well, some ASCII documentation could be inserted into org-choose.el
as a file commentary. If you use a standard header with keywords
for the finder (M-x finder-commentary and friends), that would be
useful.
Tutorials on Worg are usually written in Org, but you can upload
any
26 matches
Mail list logo
