On Dec 11, 2007, at 1:15 PM, Adam Spiers wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
Adam Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm certainly not suggesting making it the default - only to make it
possible to enable this behaviour for selected remember templates.
But since I
Adam Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) It's convenient to be able to double-check the content of the
*Remember* buffer before remembering it with `C-c C-c'.
It can be yes, but I think it's really a matter of personal taste
applied on a per-template basis. Personally I would rather
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Bastien wrote:
Adam Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm certainly not suggesting making it the default - only to make it
possible to enable this behaviour for selected remember templates.
But since I get SO many emails every day, I really need to
Adam Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this would be nice. But I guess you see my point about
cancelling : with a %^{prompt} it's possible to C-g, but not when there
is no %^{prompt} -- which might be a bit dangerous..
It doesn't seem particularly dangerous to me: you still have the
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 03:22:07PM +, Bastien wrote:
Hi Adam,
Adam Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simple feature request:
Could we make it optional whether C-c C-c is required to store a note,
on a per-template basis? This makes most sense when it is known in
advance that
Simple feature request:
Could we make it optional whether C-c C-c is required to store a note,
on a per-template basis? This makes most sense when it is known in
advance that the only things which might need to be changed within the
template are already taken care of via %^{foo} prompts. So
