Robert Goldman wrote:
>On 8/1/10 Aug 1 -1:28 PM, David Maus wrote:
>> Robert Goldman wrote:
>>> [1 ]
>>> As far as I can tell, the current version of org-write-agenda evaluates
>>> ps-print-buffer-with-faces too eagerly. I tripped over this because
>>> aquamacs 2.0, which I'm using, seems to have
On 8/1/10 Aug 1 -1:28 PM, David Maus wrote:
> Robert Goldman wrote:
>> [1 ]
>> As far as I can tell, the current version of org-write-agenda evaluates
>> ps-print-buffer-with-faces too eagerly. I tripped over this because
>> aquamacs 2.0, which I'm using, seems to have ps-printing code that
>> co
Robert Goldman wrote:
>[1 ]
>As far as I can tell, the current version of org-write-agenda evaluates
>ps-print-buffer-with-faces too eagerly. I tripped over this because
>aquamacs 2.0, which I'm using, seems to have ps-printing code that
>conflicts with org-mode's expectation.
>The attached patc
Robert Goldman wrote:
>[1 ]
>As far as I can tell, the current version of org-write-agenda evaluates
>ps-print-buffer-with-faces too eagerly. I tripped over this because
>aquamacs 2.0, which I'm using, seems to have ps-printing code that
>conflicts with org-mode's expectation.
>The attached patc
As far as I can tell, the current version of org-write-agenda evaluates
ps-print-buffer-with-faces too eagerly. I tripped over this because
aquamacs 2.0, which I'm using, seems to have ps-printing code that
conflicts with org-mode's expectation.
The attached patch tries to fix this, but does not