On Mar 20, 2009, at 3:59 AM, Jota Pin wrote:
Le jeudi 19 mars 2009, Peter Jones a écrit :
Jota Pin jotapin2...@yahoo.fr writes:
I tried to figure out how to avoid having archived subtrees to
contribute
to the sum of times showed with Display Times c-c c-x c-d.
I've been wondering something along the same lines myself. When
switching to column view via C-c C-x C-c it can sometimes take a long
time because of archive items.
Hi Peter, this case makes sense, for speed, and I have added
a variable org-columns-skip-archived-trees, with default t.
I haven't gotten around to looking into this yet. Maybe I'll try
to fix
this tomorrow when I get some time.
Thanks, this would be great.
Maybe an explanation of the reason to doing so is helpful:
I like to see the time spent per subtree, but at the same time I do
want to
keep the archives in their original location: I use sometimes
archives tags
to store versions of the same subtree, and of course the clocks must
no count
twice there...
Hi Jota,
for this case I am not sure. The purpose or archiving is to mark a tree
as finished, but clearly any clocking times from this tree should still
contribute. I see that you are using ARCHIVE to mark a second version
of a given tree. If you need multiple versions, why don't you keep
older versions in another file or so?
Are there more opinions about this? Maybe I am seeing it wrong.
- Carsten
Same question for clock tables.
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
