[Orgmode] Re: [org-babel] Does org-babel needs some simplification?
Daniel Brunner writes:
> I know, org-mode is a growing project and I really really like the
> org-babel features. But for me it is now not advisable any more to keep
> on the master branch. Today I spent several hours for finding the
> reasons why something is not working any more. And that is too much for
> a productive environment.
I too run my production org-mode stuff from the master branch. If you
pull and things break you can just step back to the commit you were at
before your pull with
$ git checkout ORIG_HEAD
All of your local commit changes should be available in the reflog so
you can go back to any recent point in time in your repository.
$ git reflog
will show a list of commits you have visited recently and you can return
to any one with a checkout of the SHA1 or by using the h...@{n} shortcut
-- just beware that h...@{n} changes everytime you move HEAD on your
repository.
Another method is to tag commits you know are good - so you can return
to them easily using whatever-name-you-like.
HTH,
Bernt
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: [org-babel] Does org-babel needs some simplification?
__ Jonathan Arkell Tech Lead Inspired By Drum & Bass, Scheme, Kawaii p. 403.206.4377 402 -- 11th Ave SE Calgary, AB, Canada T2G 0Y4 jonath...@criticalmass.com criticalmass.com Hi Daniel I would say, that if you absolutely need a productive environment, then you should stick to the official releases, rather then the latest and greatest, as sad as that might sound. Conversely, if things break the next time you do a git pull, you could pull from a previous version to see if it is still broken. It's bleeding edge for a reason! On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Daniel Brunner wrote: > Hello everyone, > > thanks for bringing this topic up. I do not want to be misunderstood: > org-mode is one of the greatest things developed the last years. I use > it every day and it is a great help. I also appreciate the work of all > those developers contributing to org-mode / babel. > > My setup is: I use the git repository because I like some of the new > features und from time to time I "pull" the new things. Normalley a > "make" does the job and flipping through the log messages helps me to > understand the new things. I use org-mode on my main business machine; > ok, perhaps it is a bit risky. And I try to use as much as possible > "out-of-the-box". > > But then my .emacs reported problems: org-babel has changed its place > and the way it is loaded. I found the reason for that in the news > group. But then the nice patch by Eric Schulte for tangling "org-mode" > files doesn't work any more because "org-babel-tangle-langs" does not > exist any more. And David Maus' addition org-atom for generating atom > feeds is broken because there is something with a > org-export-inbuffer-options-extra variable (which is not a org-babel > problem as I suppose). > > I know, org-mode is a growing project and I really really like the > org-babel features. But for me it is now not advisable any more to keep > on the master branch. Today I spent several hours for finding the > reasons why something is not working any more. And that is too much for > a productive environment. > > Today, I am a bit sad about my broken org-mode installation and I am > going back to the 6.36c. > > Kind regards, Daniel. > > > ___ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode The information contained in this message is confidential. It is intended to be read only by the individual or entity named above or their designee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any distribution of this message, in any form, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete or destroy any copy of this message. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: [org-babel] Does org-babel needs some simplification?
Hello everyone, thanks for bringing this topic up. I do not want to be misunderstood: org-mode is one of the greatest things developed the last years. I use it every day and it is a great help. I also appreciate the work of all those developers contributing to org-mode / babel. My setup is: I use the git repository because I like some of the new features und from time to time I "pull" the new things. Normalley a "make" does the job and flipping through the log messages helps me to understand the new things. I use org-mode on my main business machine; ok, perhaps it is a bit risky. And I try to use as much as possible "out-of-the-box". But then my .emacs reported problems: org-babel has changed its place and the way it is loaded. I found the reason for that in the news group. But then the nice patch by Eric Schulte for tangling "org-mode" files doesn't work any more because "org-babel-tangle-langs" does not exist any more. And David Maus' addition org-atom for generating atom feeds is broken because there is something with a org-export-inbuffer-options-extra variable (which is not a org-babel problem as I suppose). I know, org-mode is a growing project and I really really like the org-babel features. But for me it is now not advisable any more to keep on the master branch. Today I spent several hours for finding the reasons why something is not working any more. And that is too much for a productive environment. Today, I am a bit sad about my broken org-mode installation and I am going back to the 6.36c. Kind regards, Daniel. ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
