>> An important question here is: is it important for M-} to ignore those \\?
> I guess so, this is the current default Org behaviour anyhow.
Good.
> as far as I understand, it would be anyhow possible to move point on
> an alinea-by-alinea basis just by configuring the tailing \\ as
> anohter pa
>> Maybe an example is better to explain what I need, imagine that I have
>> the following two paragraphs:
>[...]
>> Where I assumed that alineas are separated by either an empty line or a
>> tailing `\\' while paragraphs are separated by just an empty line.
>
>An important question here is: is it
> Maybe an example is better to explain what I need, imagine that I have
> the following two paragraphs:
[...]
> Where I assumed that alineas are separated by either an empty line or a
> tailing `\\' while paragraphs are separated by just an empty line.
An important question here is: is it importa
Hi,
Good to see that I am not the only one needing that sort of things.
Maybe an example is better to explain what I need, imagine that I have
the following two paragraphs:
---
aaa a aaa a aaa a a a a
Vincent, examples?
--
The Kafka Pandemic:
http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com/2010/12/welcome-to-kafka-pandemic-two-forces_9182.html
I support the Whittemore-Peterson Institute (WPI)
===
I want to see the original (pre-hold) Lo et al. 2010 NIH/FDA/Harvard MLV paper.
> The proposal is to add, in addition to paragraph separator, an alinea
> separator. Accordingly there would be a forward-alinea function similar
> to forward-paragraph.
I'm not completely sure I understand the details, so let me try to
describe what I think you're suggesting: you're suggesting to
