On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 08:50 +0200, "Carsten Dominik"
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> I have pushed a fix, please verify.
>
> - Carsten
Yes, the line is no longer there.
Thank you for always fixing bugs so quickly!
Peter.
> On Sep 3, 2009, at 12:07 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 02 Se
Hi Peter,
I have pushed a fix, please verify.
- Carsten
On Sep 3, 2009, at 12:07 AM, Peter Westlake wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:35 +0200, "Carsten Dominik"
wrote:
Hi Peter,
is this only happening if the entry is the *first* entry in the list
in the agenda?
No, it's the same if it's s
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 23:35 +0200, "Carsten Dominik"
wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> is this only happening if the entry is the *first* entry in the list
> in the agenda?
No, it's the same if it's second or third too (or more, but I stopped
there).
Thanks for looking at this,
Peter.
> - Carsten
>
> On
Hi Peter,
is this only happening if the entry is the *first* entry
in the list in the agenda?
- Carsten
On Sep 2, 2009, at 11:02 PM, Peter Westlake wrote:
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:11 -0400, "Nick Dokos"
wrote:
Matt Lundin wrote:
...
I can't duplicate this.
GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i686-pc-lin
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:11 -0400, "Nick Dokos"
wrote:
> Matt Lundin wrote:
...
> > I can't duplicate this.
> >
> > GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.16.5)
> >
> > Org-mode version 6.30c
> >
>
> Neither can I (same versions, more-or-less).
>
> Peter, can you check the face
Matt Lundin wrote:
> "Peter Westlake" writes:
>
> > This is quite obscure, and an odd corner case, but here it is.
> >
> > If you have an item which is:
> >
> > - a TODO
> > - scheduled
> > - ordered
> > - blocked by a child TODO
> >
> > then it leaves an empty line in the agenda.
> >
> > Here'
"Peter Westlake" writes:
> This is quite obscure, and an odd corner case, but here it is.
>
> If you have an item which is:
>
> - a TODO
> - scheduled
> - ordered
> - blocked by a child TODO
>
> then it leaves an empty line in the agenda.
>
> Here's a test case:
> ,
> | * Press t r on this li
