Bernt,
Still digging into this. You said:
> TAGS are much more flexible for controlling what you see on
> the agenda and I use tags for filtering what is displayed on the agenda.
Am I right though that from the point of view of clocking tasks, you
rely not on TAGS but on having each task live in
Bernt,
Still digging into this. You said:
> TAGS are much more flexible for controlling what you see on
> the agenda and I use tags for filtering what is displayed on the agenda.
Am I right though that from the point of view of clocking tasks, you
rely not on TAGS but on having each task live in
Hi Tommy,
Comments are inline below.
Tommy Kelly writes:
> Bernt,
>
> Still digging into this. You said:
>
>> TAGS are much more flexible for controlling what you see on
>> the agenda and I use tags for filtering what is displayed on the agenda.
>
> Am I right though that from the point of view
Tommy Kelly writes:
> "Thomas S. Dye" writes:
>> Several times when I've had this type of question, I've found answers
>> I can use on Bernt Hansen's Org-mode pages:
>>
>> http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html
>
> Actually, when I said:
>
>>> And I like the idea discussed in http://orgmode.org/org.
"Thomas S. Dye" writes:
> Several times when I've had this type of question, I've found answers
> I can use on Bernt Hansen's Org-mode pages:
>
> http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html
Actually, when I said:
>> And I like the idea discussed in http://orgmode.org/org.html, where
I mis-copy/paste
> I can see that TODOs can be organized using tags, or categories, or
> files, or simply subtrees (or several of those). Is there an obvious
> choice?
>From my own experience, Orgmode 'favors' tags more than categories i.e.,
there is more bells and whistles surrounding tags rather than
categorie
