[Orgmode] Re: Capture template and elisp expression

2011-01-08 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Štěpán Němec wrote: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Štěpán Němec wrote: Why aren't the %() expressions simply evaluated in the original buffer (if available)? That would solve these issues in a general way. It

[Orgmode] Re: Capture template and elisp expression

2011-01-08 Thread Štěpán Němec
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On Jan 7, 2011, at 4:00 PM, Štěpán Němec wrote: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Štěpán Němec wrote: Why aren't the %() expressions simply evaluated in the original buffer (if available)? That

[Orgmode] Re: Capture template and elisp expression

2011-01-07 Thread Štěpán Němec
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:26 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I want to use a Capture Template to record changes to files under version control. Everything works as expected, but I would like to include the

[Orgmode] Re: Capture template and elisp expression

2011-01-07 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Štěpán Němec wrote: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:26 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I want to use a Capture Template to record changes to files under version control. Everything

[Orgmode] Re: Capture template and elisp expression

2011-01-07 Thread Rainer M Krug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/07/2011 03:14 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Štěpán Němec wrote: Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On Jan 6, 2011, at 11:26 PM, Nick Dokos wrote: Rainer M Krug r.m.k...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I

[Orgmode] Re: Capture template and elisp expression

2011-01-07 Thread Štěpán Němec
Carsten Dominik carsten.domi...@gmail.com writes: On Jan 7, 2011, at 1:08 PM, Štěpán Němec wrote: Why aren't the %() expressions simply evaluated in the original buffer (if available)? That would solve these issues in a general way. It seems to me that there is no advantage to evaluating the