Herbert Sitz wrote:
> Lawrence Mitchell gmx.li> writes:
> Is it possible to specify estimated effort in something other than hours
> (0.5, or 0:30)?
>>> Being able to specify suffixes like `d' for days or `w' for weeks would be
>>> awesome. But I guess it's very, very complex, though.
>>
Lawrence Mitchell gmx.li> writes:
> >>> Is it possible to specify estimated effort in something other than hours
> >>> (0.5, or 0:30)?
>
> > Being able to specify suffixes like `d' for days or `w' for weeks would be
> > awesome. But I guess it's very, very complex, though.
>
> Turns out probably
Sébastien Vauban wrote:
> Hi Bastien and Luke,
> Bastien wrote:
>> Luke Crook writes:
>>> Is it possible to specify estimated effort in something other than hours
>>> (0.5, or 0:30)?
>> No, it's not possible right now.
> But I second this idea: that'd be a great addition. Too often, we have to
Hi Bastien and Luke,
Bastien wrote:
> Luke Crook writes:
>> Is it possible to specify estimated effort in something other than hours
>> (0.5, or 0:30)?
>
> No, it's not possible right now.
But I second this idea: that'd be a great addition. Too often, we have to play
with figures such as 64:00 o
