Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am considering the idea to move the org development to a public git
repository.
This is not yet sure and official, but if you want to take a look at the
current state of the repository, check out
http://repo.or.cz/w/org-mode.git
\o/ :)
I
On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am considering the idea to move the org development to a public
git repository.
This is not yet sure and official, but if you want to take a look
at the
current state of the repository, check
I'm a bazaar fan myself. I'd be curious if someone can point out where
git is superior. ;]
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am considering the idea to move the org
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am considering the idea to move the org development to a public
git repository.
This would be superb!
This is not yet sure and
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:01:13AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote:
I'm a bazaar fan myself. I'd be curious if someone can point out where
git is superior. ;]
I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty sure that I saw reference
to issues with the design of the underlying backend. The most obvious
I use mercurial just because it's supposed to work better with windows
(work).
-Hugo
On Jan 31, 2008 1:34 PM, Adam Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 04:39:50PM +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008, at 4:33 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote:
Carsten Dominik [EMAIL
When I was selecting a VC, I narrowed it down to Bazaar or Git. Being
a prior Arch user, Bazaar fixed most of my complaints while using the
same architecture.
I understand Git's got quite a following, and addresses many of the
same shortcomings of CVS that Bazaar and other distributed VC's
Adam Spiers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:01:13AM -0600, Russell Adams wrote:
I'm a bazaar fan myself. I'd be curious if someone can point out where
git is superior. ;]
I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty sure that I saw reference
to issues with the design of
And Russell Adams writes:
When I was selecting a VC, I narrowed it down to Bazaar or Git. Being
a prior Arch user, Bazaar fixed most of my complaints while using the
same architecture.
The Arch architecture doesn't fit everyone. In particular, a
colleague and I used tla to shoot changes back
