r...@rosslaird.info (Ross A. Laird) writes:
> So, before the age of Khafre no one seems to have thought to make art
> that was specific enough to be identifiable as one individual.
Or such art didn't survive because it was made of perishable materials.
Or it was specific enough to be identifiable
Carsten Dominik writes:
> On Feb 28, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Ross A. Laird wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik writes:
>>
>>> Hi Ross,
>>>
>>> great post, thank you very much!
>>>
>>> You have made me curious: What argumentation is used to estimate
>>> the age of Myth at 7 years. I can't be the fossile
On Feb 28, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Ross A. Laird wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi Ross,
great post, thank you very much!
You have made me curious: What argumentation is used to estimate
the age of Myth at 7 years. I can't be the fossile record,
I guess :-) So I am wondering how something
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi Ross,
>
> great post, thank you very much!
>
> You have made me curious: What argumentation is used to estimate
> the age of Myth at 7 years. I can't be the fossile record,
> I guess :-) So I am wondering how something like this is figured out.
>
> If you feel
