> I appreciate that org/outline mode respects the integrity of the outline
> tree. Otherwise, IMO, M-up/down could easily wreak havoc with the
> structure of the document.
ditto. See I thought there was a Good Reason.
Scot
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing l
Thank you all for your input, I am not going to make a change here.
- Carsten
On Aug 11, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
Leo writes:
On 2009-08-11 10:24 +0100, PT wrote:
Often I want to move an item or a subtree to an other location
with M-up/down and I get the message "Cannot move pa
Leo writes:
> On 2009-08-11 10:24 +0100, PT wrote:
>> Often I want to move an item or a subtree to an other location
>> with M-up/down and I get the message "Cannot move past superior
>> level".
>>
>> I think there could be an option allowing this behavior. In
>> practice I found sometimes it wou
On 2009-08-11 10:24 +0100, PT wrote:
> Often I want to move an item or a subtree to an other location
> with M-up/down and I get the message "Cannot move past superior
> level".
>
> I think there could be an option allowing this behavior. In
> practice I found sometimes it would be quicker and easi
PT writes:
Hi!
>> So it would spare at least an M-left for the user which doesn't seem
>> much, but small things add up in the long run.
>>
>
> Maybe the M-right part wouldn't be too hard either. If above the moved
> up header (which is now at the same level as its previous parent
> header afte
PT gmail.com> writes:
>
> So it would spare at least an M-left for the user which doesn't seem much,
> but
> small things add up in the long run.
>
Maybe the M-right part wouldn't be too hard either. If above the
moved up header (which is now at the same level as its previous
parent header af
Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes:
>
> I do M-left M-up M-right to get past a parent. When moving down,
> M-left M-down M-right will get you to the end of that subtree, but
> otherwise it works just fine.
It seems like something which org could also do if the user sets the option.
If I move t
> +1
>
> I always supposed there was some Good Reason (tm) for prohibiting
> this, which I hadn't yet understood, so I never asked for it before.
> But since PT asked, I'll join in.
>
> Scot
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:24 AM, PT wrote:
>> Often I want to move an item or a subtree to an other l
