[Orgmode] Re: Problem with recurring timestamps
Martin Pohlack m...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de writes: Hi Martin, I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: -- * TODO test3 DEADLINE: 2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h -- When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally mark it as done. Org-version reports 6.21b. I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning period, it works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, changing the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. Bye, Tassilo ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Problem with recurring timestamps
Tassilo Horn wrote: Martin Pohlack m...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de writes: Hi Martin, I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: -- * TODO test3 DEADLINE: 2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h -- When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally mark it as done. Org-version reports 6.21b. I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning period, it works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, changing the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. The problem seems to be that [+-]xh is not yet supported. Given that timestamps can have an hour and minute component, the h syntax seems logical, right? Cheers, Martin Pohlack ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Problem with recurring timestamps
On Jul 6, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Martin Pohlack wrote: Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote: Tassilo Horn wrote: Martin Pohlack m...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de writes: Hi Martin, I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: -- * TODO test3 DEADLINE: 2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h -- When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally mark it as done. Org-version reports 6.21b. I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning period, it works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, changing the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. The problem seems to be that [+-]xh is not yet supported. yes, prewarning periods for deadlines have to de d, w, m, or y. Hours and minutes are not supported. How are you planing to use this? I have a weekly recurring event which is due Friday 17:00, but I can only start working on it shortly before, say 2 h. I would like it not to appear in the agenda until 15:00 at Friday, or it could appear at Friday's agenda, with an extended timestamp (15:00), so I know it has to be done later. I could also be handled like this item: -- * TODO test4 DEADLINE: 2009-07-06 Mo 14:00 SCHEDULED: 2009-07-06 Mo 13:00 -- This looks like a very good way to handle this use case. The daily agenda is really about what is up today, and it should tell you in the morning what stuff is waiting for you instead of giving you nasty surprises at 3 in the afternoon. You can add a repeater to both the deadline and the scheduled item, they will both be kicked forward when you mark the entry done. HTH - Carsten In the agenda: Monday 6 July 2009 W28 8:00.. 10:00.. 12:00.. file.org:13:00.. Scheduled: TODO test4 file.org:14:00.. Deadline: TODO test4 14:00.. 16:00.. 18:00.. 20:00.. Cheers, Martin Pohlack ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Problem with recurring timestamps
Carsten Dominik wrote: On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:53 AM, Martin Pohlack wrote: Tassilo Horn wrote: Martin Pohlack m...@os.inf.tu-dresden.de writes: Hi Martin, I have problems with the following recurring timestamp: -- * TODO test3 DEADLINE: 2009-07-07 Di 15:00 +1w -1h -- When I mark the item as done, it loses the warning period (-1h) and the recurrence markup (+1w). Marking it as done again, will finally mark it as done. Org-version reports 6.21b. I can confirm that with 6.28trans. When removing the warning period, it works as expected. Also, when removing the recurrence markup, changing the item to DONE keeps the -1h intact. The problem seems to be that [+-]xh is not yet supported. yes, prewarning periods for deadlines have to de d, w, m, or y. Hours and minutes are not supported. How are you planing to use this? I have a weekly recurring event which is due Friday 17:00, but I can only start working on it shortly before, say 2 h. I would like it not to appear in the agenda until 15:00 at Friday, or it could appear at Friday's agenda, with an extended timestamp (15:00), so I know it has to be done later. I could also be handled like this item: -- * TODO test4 DEADLINE: 2009-07-06 Mo 14:00 SCHEDULED: 2009-07-06 Mo 13:00 -- In the agenda: Monday 6 July 2009 W28 8:00.. 10:00.. 12:00.. file.org:13:00.. Scheduled: TODO test4 file.org:14:00.. Deadline: TODO test4 14:00.. 16:00.. 18:00.. 20:00.. Cheers, Martin Pohlack ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Problem with recurring timestamps
Carsten Dominik wrote: [...] I could also be handled like this item: -- * TODO test4 DEADLINE: 2009-07-06 Mo 14:00 SCHEDULED: 2009-07-06 Mo 13:00 -- This looks like a very good way to handle this use case. The daily agenda is really about what is up today, and it should tell you in the morning what stuff is waiting for you instead of giving you nasty surprises at 3 in the afternoon. You can add a repeater to both the deadline and the scheduled item, they will both be kicked forward when you mark the entry done. Ahh, this solves my problem, thanks. I didn't know they were completed in one step. Cheers, Martin Pohlack PS.: There is only this little symmetry itching thing left ;-). ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
