On Nov 8, 2009, at 7:24 PM, Paul Mead wrote:
Carsten Dominik writes:
I actually think that few people use archiving to sibling. Am I
wrong about
this?
I use archiving to sibling for sub-headings in projects that are still
current, to tidy things up, then archive the whole project subtre
Hm...
Paul Mead schrieb:
> Carsten Dominik writes:
> > I actually think that few people use archiving to sibling. Am I wrong about
> > this?
I've never used archiving to sibling on purpose. After using it
accidentaly once, I was a bit annoyed at having to clean up the
structure of my project.
Carsten Dominik writes:
> I actually think that few people use archiving to sibling. Am I wrong about
> this?
I use archiving to sibling for sub-headings in projects that are still
current, to tidy things up, then archive the whole project subtree to
the archive file when it's finished. I'd pre
I use both
short topic in a still ongoing section I use simple archive
But when I finish a section or it is something I will not use for a
while I use archive to sibling.
Therefore setting
(setq org-archive-default-command 'org-archive-to-archive-sibling)
to use the "a" string
is not interes
At Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:33:30 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> I actually think that few people use archiving to sibling. Am I
> wrong about this?
For what it is worth, I have started to use archive to sibling quite a
lot in the last month or so. I also like to tidy up my org files, but
I need to
Carsten Dominik writes:
> OK, here is what I have now settled for, effective immediately:
>
> The following keys now do archiving
>
> C-c C-x C-aarchive using the command specified in
>`org-archive-default-command'
>
> This variable is by default set to `org-archive-subtree',
Carsten Dominik writes:
> OK, here is what I have now settled for, effective immediately:
>
> The following keys now do archiving
>
> C-c C-x C-aarchive using the command specified in
>`org-archive-default-command'
>
> This variable is by default set to `org-archive-subtree',
On 2009-10-30 06:54 +, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> I would like to change some key bindings related to archiving, and
> this change will also affect the access key for attachments.
>
> The main reason is that I think there should be a single default key
> for archiving, and that the user sets a va
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:36:43 -0400
Matt Lundin wrote:
> My chief concern with mapping archiving to C-c C-a is that it is too
> close to the conventional keybinding for org-agenda (C-c a). With the
> proposed keybindings, I fear it might be too easy to introduce drastic
> changes in a file acciden
On Oct 30, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Matt Lundin wrote:
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
Hi everyone,
I would like to change some key bindings related to archiving,
and this change will also affect the access key for attachments.
The main reason is that I think there should be a single defaul
Peter Frings writes:
> On 30 Oct 2009, at 10:54, Friedrich Delgado Friedrichs wrote:
>
>> Carsten Dominik schrieb:
>>> The main reason is that I think there should be a single default key
>>> for archiving, and that the user sets a variable to decide what the
>>> default archiving method should b
Hi Carsten,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I would like to change some key bindings related to archiving,
> and this change will also affect the access key for attachments.
>
> The main reason is that I think there should be a single default key
> for archiving, and that the user set
12 matches
Mail list logo
