[Orgmode] Re: Weird notes... Conflict with lists?
Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Sébastien Vauban writes: > >> For my curiosity, what was the problem? Some border-line config of >> mine? > > Not really borderline, but (setq org-log-states-order-reversed nil) showed > the weakness of my assumptions regarding indentation. I was indeed quite > certain that indenting with `org-indent-line-function' would be fine... Thanks for the analysis. Best regards, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Weird notes... Conflict with lists?
Hello, > Sébastien Vauban writes: > For my curiosity, what was the problem? Some border-line config of > mine? Not really borderline, but (setq org-log-states-order-reversed nil) showed the weakness of my assumptions regarding indentation. I was indeed quite certain that indenting with `org-indent-line-function' would be fine... Regards, -- Nicolas ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Weird notes... Conflict with lists?
Hello Nicolas, > Patch sent, and thanks. For my curiosity, what was the problem? Some border-line config of mine? Best regards, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Weird notes... Conflict with lists?
Hello, Patch sent, and thanks. Regards, -- Nicolas ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Weird notes... Conflict with lists?
Hello, > Sébastien Vauban writes: > - Just add a second-level entry. - Via speed keys, `td' (was a > mistake, wanted to write `tt') - Via speed keys, `tw', and wrote a > small message. I'm not able to reproduce it either. Could you send me your Org configuration ? Regards, -- Nicolas ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Weird notes... Conflict with lists?
Hi Noorul, Noorul Islam K M wrote: > Sébastien Vauban writes: >> >> When diffing versions of my Org files, before committing, just noticed >> this... >> >> ** WAIT Vérifier la réception du BC >> - SCHEDULED: <2010-09-03 Fri> >> + SCHEDULED: <2010-09-08 Wed> >> :LOGBOOK: >> - State "WAIT" from "TODO" [2010-09-01 Wed 14:14] \\ >> Envoyé un nouveau mail. >> + - State "DONE" from "WAIT" [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36] >> + - State "TODO" from "DONE" [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36] >> + - State "WAIT" from "TODO" [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36] \\ >> + Téléphoné. Pas de réponse. >> :END: >> >> FYI, Org-mode version is 7.01trans (release_7.01h.431.g8302). Git pulled this morning -- Emacs restarted. --8<---cut here---start->8--- GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.0) of 2010-03-29 on rothera, modified by Debian release_7.01h-464-g413c Org-mode version 7.01trans (release_7.01h.464.g413c) --8<---cut here---end--->8--- > I am not able to re-produce this. This is what I get when I simply cycle > through states. > > Am I missing something? Can you reproduce this on a minimal header? Yes, reproducible: --8<---cut here---start->8--- ** WAIT Test header :LOGBOOK: - State "DONE" from "" [2010-09-07 Tue 13:41] - State "WAIT" from "DONE" [2010-09-07 Tue 13:41] \\ Test. :END: --8<---cut here---end--->8--- - Just add a second-level entry. - Via speed keys, `td' (was a mistake, wanted to write `tt') - Via speed keys, `tw', and wrote a small message. Best regards, Seb -- Sébastien Vauban ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
[Orgmode] Re: Weird notes... Conflict with lists?
Sébastien Vauban writes: > Hi, > > When diffing versions of my Org files, before committing, just noticed this... > > ** WAIT Vérifier la réception du BC > - SCHEDULED: <2010-09-03 Fri> > + SCHEDULED: <2010-09-08 Wed> > :LOGBOOK: > - State "WAIT" from "TODO" [2010-09-01 Wed 14:14] \\ > Envoyé un nouveau mail. > + - State "DONE" from "WAIT" [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36] > + - State "TODO" from "DONE" [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36] > + - State "WAIT" from "TODO" [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36] \\ > + Téléphoné. Pas de réponse. > :END: > > I've experienced other weird behaviors since the new lists are in place. Among > others, when creating a new node with M-RET, or such operations. Though, I > need to get "steps to reproduce" black on white for those ones... > > FYI, Org-mode version is 7.01trans (release_7.01h.431.g8302). I am not able to re-produce this. This is what I get when I simply cycle through states. * DONE Test header CLOSED: [2010-09-07 Tue 15:11] :LOGBOOK: - State "DONE" from "TODO" [2010-09-07 Tue 15:11] - State "TODO" from "WAITING"[2010-09-07 Tue 15:11] - State "WAITING"from "TODO" [2010-09-07 Tue 15:11] \\ Next - State "TODO" from "WAITING"[2010-09-07 Tue 15:11] - State "WAITING"from "NEXT" [2010-09-07 Tue 15:09] \\ Testing - State "NEXT" from "WAITING"[2010-09-07 Tue 15:09] - State "WAITING"from "NEXT" [2010-09-07 Tue 15:09] \\ Waiting Am I missing something? Can you reproduce this on a minimal header? Thanks and Regards Noorul ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
