Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hmmm, I see what you mean - but I don't think that is a realistic use
> case. If you have an org document, would you then want to go through
> ASCII and then markdown for HTML instead of using the direct route?
It would be marginally useful for me. I'm using blog soft
On Feb 26, 2009, at 4:53 PM, Jason F. McBrayer wrote:
Eric S Fraga writes:
On 2009-02-25, Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
I have been thinking that it might be better to force links into
footnotes for ascii export.
What do you think?
I, for one, would find this very attractive. And it
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On 2009-02-25, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>> [...]
>> I have been thinking that it might be better to force links into
>> footnotes for ascii export.
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> I, for one, would find this very attractive. And it's in line with
> what some of the text ba
On 2009-02-25, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> [...]
> I have been thinking that it might be better to force links into
> footnotes for ascii export.
>
> What do you think?
I, for one, would find this very attractive. And it's in line with
what some of the text based web browsers generate in ascii
