[Orgmode] Re: fractional hours for timestamps?

2010-08-16 Thread Richard Riley
Carsten Dominik writes: > On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: > >> Bastien writes: >> >>> Łukasz Stelmach writes: >>> I think Greg's point is about entering data using only numeric keypad. I can confirm that I have considered these issues (esp. 1400 vs. 14

Re: [Orgmode] Re: fractional hours for timestamps?

2010-08-16 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Aug 13, 2010, at 11:43 AM, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: Bastien writes: Łukasz Stelmach writes: I think Greg's point is about entering data using only numeric keypad. I can confirm that I have considered these issues (esp. 1400 vs. 14:00). Fractional hours don't seem to be that easy as the

[Orgmode] Re: fractional hours for timestamps?

2010-08-13 Thread Łukasz Stelmach
Bastien writes: > Łukasz Stelmach writes: > >> I think Greg's point is about entering data using only numeric keypad. I >> can confirm that I have considered these issues (esp. 1400 >> vs. 14:00). Fractional hours don't seem to be that easy as there are >> countries like Poland where you use com

Re: [Orgmode] Re: fractional hours for timestamps?

2010-08-13 Thread Bastien
Łukasz Stelmach writes: > I think Greg's point is about entering data using only numeric keypad. I > can confirm that I have considered these issues (esp. 1400 > vs. 14:00). Fractional hours don't seem to be that easy as there are > countries like Poland where you use comma as decimal point (work

[Orgmode] Re: fractional hours for timestamps?

2010-08-12 Thread Łukasz Stelmach
Bastien writes: > Greg Troxel writes: > >> I tried to set a timestamp "thu 12:00+1.5", using C-c . and typing the >> characters in quotes. What I got was >> <2010-08-12 Thu 12:00-13:00> >> >> I found that 12:00+1:30 works fine, but it seems like 1.5 should be >> parsed. >> >> Separately, I'd li