I'd like to write a concluding email for this thread for future
searchers to find. This easy solution is brought to you by Eric
Schulte and Christian Moe.
Place the following in your .emacs or init.el file:
;; org-mode color
(org-add-link-type
"color" nil
(lambda (path desc format)p
(cond
Hi Dan,
I think you might have found the thread to which I had intented to
post my reply that now is in the thread, "extensible syntax example
using link features". Not sure though. The last few paragraphs have
comments on a topic related to this.
Samuel
On 2010-08-10, Dan Davison wrote:
> Ca
Carsten Dominik writes:
> Hi,
>
> Can we please first read Samuels post about extensible syntax? Before
> we invent 20 other new syntaxes?
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/10204/focus=10204
May I add this thread to the discussion as an example of another feature
that was suggeste
Jambunathan K writes:
> Eric> but again, I'm reticent to commit to any particular format, as
> Eric> Org-mode does a good job of feeling consistent, and I'd not
> Eric> want to hurt that consistency.
>
> In an edit buffer, I would personally prefer to see the colour 'red'
> visually r
Eric> but again, I'm reticent to commit to any particular format, as
Eric> Org-mode does a good job of feeling consistent, and I'd not
Eric> want to hurt that consistency.
In an edit buffer, I would personally prefer to see the colour 'red'
visually rather than as a 'synctactic elemen
"Eric Schulte" writes:
> Hi Vinh,
>
> Vinh Nguyen writes:
>
>> Thanks Eric, this works.
>
> Great,
>
>> I do agree that the implemented syntax is not org-like but more
>> latex-like. To be more org-like, could we use parentheses or curly
>> braces like how links are implemented? They aren't ta
Vinh Nguyen gmail.com> writes:
>
> Apologies for the ambiguity. In the org, we can use *text* and the
> word "text" would be bold in the html output. I was wondering if
> there is a markup that would change the color, eg, \{red}[text], or
> something of that sort. I don't think it exists. I
