On Jan 3, 2010, at 4:40 AM, Andrew J. Korty wrote:
On Jan 2, 2010, at 14:37 , Carsten Dominik wrote:
I have been thinking about caching often
but always stopped implementing it because, being a plain text
system, there is always the possibility that thinks are being
changed behind the back
On Jan 2, 2010, at 02:50 , Carsten Dominik wrote:
You can shave off another .5 seconds by pressing the selection key
faster - Org spends 0.46 seconds to wait for your keypress :-)
Good point. :-)
I optimized things a bit more by caching skip positions and schedule, deadline,
and tag data for
On Jan 2, 2010, at 3:38 PM, Andrew J. Korty wrote:
On Jan 2, 2010, at 02:50 , Carsten Dominik wrote:
You can shave off another .5 seconds by pressing the selection key
faster - Org spends 0.46 seconds to wait for your keypress :-)
Good point. :-)
I optimized things a bit more by caching
On Jan 2, 2010, at 14:37 , Carsten Dominik wrote:
I have been thinking about caching often
but always stopped implementing it because, being a plain text
system, there is always the possibility that thinks are being
changed behind the back of the cache. How are you handling
updating the
Shaved off half a second. So that's something!
ajk
org-agenda1
1.534166 1.534166
org-let 1
1.070332 1.070332
org-agenda-list
My agenda views take a couple seconds to build, and I'd like them to be faster.
I'm posting a portion of configuration and some profiling results here in case
anyone can see any opportunities for optimization.
Some background: I don't use the diary at all -- this agenda view exists only
to
On Dec 30, 2009, at 14:20 , Carsten Dominik wrote:
could you please also instrument your ajk/ functions for profiling and
repeat the experiment? And show the code of all these functions, not
only some (I am missing for example `ajk/org-agenda-skip-if-due-
soon'
Yes to both -- see below
Hi Andrew, thanks!
The only thing I see now is this:
1. Get the latest development version. A week or two ago I made
an optimization that should speed up
(org-entry-get nil DEADLINE)
quite a bit.
Let's see if that does help enough.
- Carsten
On Dec 30, 2009, at 8:40 PM, Andrew J.
