Re: [Orgmode] What license for Worg?

2010-08-13 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:26:19 +0200, Bastien bastien.gue...@wikimedia.fr wrote: Hi Ian, Ian Barton li...@manor-farm.org writes: However, I think you may have to begin the long and tedious task of identifying all contributors to Worg and asking their permission. Yes I will. If

Re: [Orgmode] What license for Worg?

2010-08-10 Thread Bastien
David Maus dm...@ictsoc.de writes: IIRC there was some back and forth about compatibility of this statement and the GPL, but cannot remember where I read this. This is obvious, but why not just drop a message to FSF legal team with the question about this issue? I'm in touch with RMS about

Re: [Orgmode] What license for Worg?

2010-08-09 Thread tycho garen
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 06:36:45AM +0200, Bastien wrote: Here is what I read at the bottom of every emacswiki.org page: This work is licensed to you under version 2 of the GNU General Public License. [..] So this is GPLv2. Any idea why this isn't GPLv3? No clue. I must confess that

Re: [Orgmode] What license for Worg?

2010-08-09 Thread David Maus
Bastien wrote: Hi Tycho, tycho garen ga...@tychoish.com writes: This seems fine, the only possible concern that I have with this is that GFDL licensed code snippets aren't compatible with the GPL. I'm not sure how much actual code is in worg, and if this is an issue, but it's worth

Re: [Orgmode] What license for Worg?

2010-08-03 Thread Ian Barton
what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg? Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0[3] license. This solution would make it possible to take excerpts from Worg and

Re: [Orgmode] What license for Worg?

2010-08-03 Thread tycho garen
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 02:33:10PM +0200, Bastien wrote: Hi all, what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg? Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0[3] license.

Re: [Orgmode] What license for Worg?

2010-08-02 Thread David Maus
Bastien wrote: Hi all, what is the most suitable license (or licensing scheme) for Worg? Here is the best solution I can think of: dual-licensing[1] under the GNU Free Documentation License 1.3[2] and the Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0[3] license. This solution would make it possible to take