At Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:05:06 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
> > However, I guess the instructions you give are actually subtly
> > incorrect? That is, from what you say above, using setq is not going
> > to work because that doesn't invoke any hooks for the particular
> > variables. Theref
On Nov 26, 2009, at 9:16 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
At Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:25:21 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
On Nov 25, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Carsten,
I am puzzled. I can get this to work (and it works very well
indeed)
but only if I set these variables through the custom
At Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:25:21 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> > Carsten,
> >
> > I am puzzled. I can get this to work (and it works very well indeed)
> > but only if I set these variables through the customisation interface
> > in Emacs (custom
On Nov 25, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:28:36 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Eric,
tis works just fine for me.
Here are the values of the two variables:
org-emphasis-alist is a variable defined in `org.el'.
org-export-latex-emphasis-alist [...]
Carsten,
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:28:36 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> tis works just fine for me.
>
> Here are the values of the two variables:
>
> org-emphasis-alist is a variable defined in `org.el'.
> org-export-latex-emphasis-alist [...]
Carsten,
I am puzzled. I can get this to wo
At Wed, 25 Nov 2009 07:28:36 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> tis works just fine for me.
>
> Here are the values of the two variables:
>
> org-emphasis-alist is a variable defined in `org.el'.
> Its value is
> (("*" bold "" "")
> ("/" italic "" "")
> ("_" underline "" " span>")
Hi Eric,
tis works just fine for me.
Here are the values of the two variables:
org-emphasis-alist is a variable defined in `org.el'.
Its value is
(("*" bold "" "")
("/" italic "" "")
("_" underline "" "span>")
("=" org-code "" "" verbatim)
("~" org-verbatim "" "" verbatim)
(";" org-verbat
At Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:59:20 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
>
> Hmm, I think one would still like to be able to make text
> bold and italic as well? So I don't think one should use * or /.
> How about the exclamation mark?
>
> I guess the easiest would be to add to the two variables org-e
Hi Eric,
On Nov 24, 2009, at 9:49 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Carsten,
I've thought of one more thing that would be useful in an org to
beamer exporter: beamer has the \alert{} command for highlighting text
in a slide. It would be nice to have one or other of the *text* or
/text/ constructs in or
Carsten,
I've thought of one more thing that would be useful in an org to
beamer exporter: beamer has the \alert{} command for highlighting text
in a slide. It would be nice to have one or other of the *text* or
/text/ constructs in org translate to \alert{text}. I can, of course,
type \alert{te
At Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:55:11 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
> > 2. it would be nice to support the block environment in beamer.
>
> The problem I see here is that one might want to have blocks inside
> a column, and maybe columns inside blocks. Is both
> allowed/practical/often-used?
I mu
On Nov 23, 2009, at 11:15 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
At Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:55:53 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
Hi Eric,
I am now getting interested in beamer support. I think this is
interesting enough to implement special support for making beamer
slides.
Excellent!
Can I ask you to think
Eric listed all (or almost all) "requirements" for exporting Beamer.
Some of the mI encountered a few days ago. I decided to export the
lists into latex and then converting by hand the rest of the
presentation.
I am also very happy that "Beamer" is becoming an official directive
of org-mode.
Car
At Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:55:53 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> I am now getting interested in beamer support. I think this is
> interesting enough to implement special support for making beamer
> slides.
Excellent!
> Can I ask you to think about it in general terms, what would be
Hi Eric,
I am now getting interested in beamer support. I think this is
interesting enough to implement special support for making beamer
slides.
Can I ask you to think about it in general terms, what would be useful
to have?
One of the problems with your most recent solution for the c
> At Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:34:18 +0100,
> Carsten Dominik wrote:
> > Anything missing in Org that we should implement to support this
> > better?
Actually, going through the set of lectures I am currently preparing,
I am finding that there is one thing missing that I haven't needed
before in latex
At Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:34:18 +0100,
Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> this looks very nice! I just tried beamer for the first time,
> this is very simple now. Maybe I can drop powerpoint, at least
> for some stuff.
Thanks Carsten! Definitely drop powerpoint... I would highly
recommend o
At Sat, 21 Nov 2009 06:33:52 -1000,
Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>
> On Nov 21, 2009, at 2:49 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> > Recently, in September, there was a discussion about exporting org
> > files to latex using the beamer class and generating slides with
> > multiple columns:
[...]
>
> Aloha Eric
On Nov 21, 2009, at 2:49 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
Recently, in September, there was a discussion about exporting org
files to latex using the beamer class and generating slides with
multiple columns:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/17546
No solution was presented at that time but I
Hi Eric,
this looks very nice! I just tried beamer for the first time,
this is very simple now. Maybe I can drop powerpoint, at least
for some stuff.
I think we need a good beamer tutorial on Worg, including this
column stuff, and some text about image treatment.
Any volunteers? Anything mis
Recently, in September, there was a discussion about exporting org
files to latex using the beamer class and generating slides with
multiple columns:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/17546
No solution was presented at that time but I think I've managed to
create one that is quite reas
21 matches
Mail list logo
