Re: [Orgmode] pretty export of tags

2010-09-15 Thread Scot Becker
Great. Thanks. Scot ___ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Re: [Orgmode] pretty export of tags

2010-09-14 Thread Scot Becker
Would it not be more consistent if I just make the command for the taglist be specified in a variable, similar to org-export-latex-todo-keyword-markup. This seems the more logical solution to me.  You could still use a non-existing command and define it in the header Not sure how I missed

Re: [Orgmode] pretty export of tags

2010-09-14 Thread Carsten Dominik
On Sep 14, 2010, at 12:00 PM, Scot Becker wrote: Would it not be more consistent if I just make the command for the taglist be specified in a variable, similar to org-export-latex-todo- keyword-markup. This seems the more logical solution to me. You could still use a non-existing command

Re: [Orgmode] pretty export of tags

2010-06-04 Thread Carsten Dominik
On May 31, 2010, at 6:28 PM, Scot Becker wrote: On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:56 PM, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: I would like some more control over how tags are exported to PDF. I tried both latex and docbook based methods, and as far as I can tell, in both cases the treatment is

[Orgmode] pretty export of tags

2010-05-31 Thread David Bremner
I would like some more control over how tags are exported to PDF. I tried both latex and docbook based methods, and as far as I can tell, in both cases the treatment is hard-coded (at least in the docbook case it does mark them as being different from the headline). Is there some existing trick

Re: [Orgmode] pretty export of tags

2010-05-31 Thread Scot Becker
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:56 PM, David Bremner brem...@unb.ca wrote: I would like some more control over how tags are exported to PDF. I tried both latex and docbook based methods, and as far as I can tell, in both cases the treatment is hard-coded (at least in the docbook case it does mark