Re: [PATCH] New "project" option for org-link-file-path-type

2020-11-11 Thread Jack Kamm
Thanks, I've fixed the remaining issues you pointed out and pushed this in 5371b30fe. Cheers, Jack

Re: [PATCH] New "project" option for org-link-file-path-type

2020-11-05 Thread Kyle Meyer
Jack Kamm writes: > I like the idea of letting org-link-file-path-type be a function. > > However, it struck me that it might be too limiting to just have the > function return the project root. There's a lot more potential for > customization here -- for example, a user might want to combine the

Re: [PATCH] New "project" option for org-link-file-path-type

2020-11-04 Thread Jack Kamm
Hi Kyle, > As a projectile user, I'm tempted to suggest that, instead of the adding > the `project' value, org-insert-link could learn to call > org-link-file-path-type if it is a function and, if that returns > non-nil, do the prefix check. Then projectile users could set it to >

Re: [PATCH] New "project" option for org-link-file-path-type

2020-11-01 Thread Kyle Meyer
r, unless the user installed a new project.el via ELPA. More on that below. > Subject: [PATCH] ol.el: New option "project" for org-link-file-path-type [...] > @@ -212,13 +212,17 @@ (defcustom org-link-file-path-type 'adaptive > absolute Absolute path, if possible with ~ for home d

[PATCH] New "project" option for org-link-file-path-type

2020-10-28 Thread Jack Kamm
ck whether the functionality is available, and to silence compiler warnings. I'm not sure if this is the correct way to do it. >From c5f9d4043a6cf6a325d122be24214356f36446f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jack Kamm Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 17:29:04 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ol.el: New option "pro