Kyle Meyer writes:
> Pushed (3e64d3475).
Thank you!
>> As far as I can tell, that is not fully possible today, even with this
>> patch. The reason is that time *range* information entered at the prompt
>> generated by :time-prompt gets thrown away. The reason for *that* is
>> that org-read-date
Richard Lawrence writes:
> Kyle Meyer writes:
>
>> Testing that against the cases in your initial report, I believe it
>> leads to the same results as your patch, so here's a cleaned-up version.
>
> I confirm that this cleaned up version works for me and gets the same
> results for my test cases.
up version works for me and gets the same
results for my test cases. I think it should be applied (modulo one
nitpick below). Are you willing to apply it, Kyle? I don't have commit
rights myself.
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH] capture: Fix handling of time range for :time-prompt
>
>
>if cleanup):
Testing that against the cases in your initial report, I believe it
leads to the same results as your patch, so here's a cleaned-up version.
-- >8 --
Subject: [PATCH] capture: Fix handling of time range for :time-prompt
* lisp/org-capture.el (org-capture-set-target-locat