Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals (was: Second Ctl in keychord not detected)

2022-01-25 Thread Tim Cross
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Tim Cross writes: > >> Ihor Radchenko writes: >> >>> Also, it appears to me that we may keep losing terminal-incompatible >>> keys in future unless we provide some mechanisms to check terminal >>> compatibility automatically. Any ideas? >>> >> >> No ideas on this.

Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals (was: Second Ctl in keychord not detected)

2022-01-24 Thread Ihor Radchenko
Tim Cross writes: > Ihor Radchenko writes: > >> Also, it appears to me that we may keep losing terminal-incompatible >> keys in future unless we provide some mechanisms to check terminal >> compatibility automatically. Any ideas? >> > > No ideas on this. Problem being I don't think there is

Re: Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals (was: Second Ctl in keychord not detected)

2022-01-21 Thread Tim Cross
Ihor Radchenko writes: > Also, it appears to me that we may keep losing terminal-incompatible > keys in future unless we provide some mechanisms to check terminal > compatibility automatically. Any ideas? > No ideas on this. Problem being I don't think there is anything like a terminfo

Extend the existing alternative set of key bindings for terminals (was: Second Ctl in keychord not detected)

2022-01-19 Thread Ihor Radchenko
"Loris Bennett" writes: >> Then, it is terminal input problem. See >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/0801/why-does-ctrl-not-work-when-i-bind-it-to-a-command-in-emacs/8511#8511 > > You're right, the problem also happens locally when I start Emacs with > '-nw'. Thanks for the