Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-02-01 Thread Bastien
Hi Kisaragi Hiu, > Done; I haven't done the copyright assignment paperwork with FSF, but > I guess it's fine since this is under the 15 line limit? Yes, thanks a lot. I've applied your commits to th master branch. I just added the TINYCHANGE cookie in the commit messages. > I copied a few

Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-02-01 Thread Kisaragi Hiu
Done; I haven't done the copyright assignment paperwork with FSF, but I guess it's fine since this is under the 15 line limit? I copied a few examples from org-duration.el, which is what actually defines the format (org-refresh-effort-estimates). I also corrected the docstring of

Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-02-01 Thread Bastien
Hi Kisaragi Hiu, Kisaragi Hiu writes: > Currently, the Info node about effort estimates does not mention what > format should it be written in. This causes confusion, as a user might > assume that it's the same format as schedulers (10m, 6h, etc.) like I > did. > > Simply mentioning "Effort

Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-01-31 Thread Bastien
Hi Jean-Christophe, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > I'm not sure would be pertinent to create a whole section for duration > format: these are not quite as ubiquitous as timestamps. However, they > are used here and there so it may be better to add a few words in the > appropriate sections, the main

Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-01-07 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Jean-Christophe Helary writes: >> On Jan 4, 2020, at 14:20, Kisaragi Hiu wrote: >> >> It didn't work for me because I gave it "10m" which actually means 10 >> months, I've realized. >> >> Still, Durations as defined by org-duration.el should be described in the >> manual like how

Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-01-03 Thread Jean-Christophe Helary
> On Jan 4, 2020, at 14:20, Kisaragi Hiu wrote: > > It didn't work for me because I gave it "10m" which actually means 10 months, > I've realized. > > Still, Durations as defined by org-duration.el should be described in the > manual like how Timestamps are. This does look like a

Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-01-03 Thread Kisaragi Hiu
It didn't work for me because I gave it "10m" which actually means 10 months, I've realized. Still, Durations as defined by org-duration.el should be described in the manual like how Timestamps are. 2020年1月4日 11:55 差出し人: k...@kyleam.com: > Kisaragi Hiu writes: > >> Currently, the Info node

Re: Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-01-03 Thread Kyle Meyer
Kisaragi Hiu writes: > Currently, the Info node about effort estimates does not mention what > format should it be written in. This causes confusion, as a user might > assume that it's the same format as schedulers (10m, 6h, etc.) like I > did. > > Simply mentioning "Effort estimates need to

Format of Effort estimates should be mentioned in its Info node

2020-01-02 Thread Kisaragi Hiu
Currently, the Info node about effort estimates does not mention what format should it be written in. This causes confusion, as a user might assume that it's the same format as schedulers (10m, 6h, etc.) like I did. Simply mentioning "Effort estimates need to have the format H:MM" (copied from