For me, I don't like my paragraphs indented. That just adds more speech
from Emacspeak. I'm glad y'all talked about which setting does this so I
can turn it off.. I mean, I don't know of any reason why paragraphs
should be indented, but that's just my opinion. Maybe visual appeal,
looking more
> possibly i'm misunderstanding, but my sense is that the value of org
> adapt indentation doesn't change what you might actually find ("in a
> .org file in the wild"). so, whatever its value, your grammar would
> have to deal with all cases?
Yep, we can't magically change all the files out in
Tom,
> The other reason I think this is a good idea is because I have been
> working on a formal grammar for the org syntax, and everything would
> be SO much simpler about the implementation after the first pass parse
> if the canonical representation of an Org file did not allow
> significant
> in case not obvious, i am suggesting a nil value for org adapt indentation.
> thus no physical indentation of all lines including planning lines.
> i'd even suggest no physical indentation as default for example and
> source blocks, but that is a can of worms.
I know that this is a can of
in case not obvious, i am suggesting a nil value for org adapt indentation.
thus no physical indentation of all lines including planning lines.
i'd even suggest no physical indentation as default for example and
source blocks, but that is a can of worms.
On 12/22/20, Samuel Wales wrote:
>
there are just a few defaults i think are better for new users,
despite discoverability.
no indentation is one such.
1 changes org files less [better for e.g. merging]
2 requires less filling maintenance [for the body text; bastien's
change works here]
3 requires less adjustment when
Bastien writes:
> Also, I'm thinking of using headline-data as the new default for the
> org-adapt-indentation option. WDYT?
FWIW if we're going to change the default, I'd vote for the simpler and
longer-existing nil value.
Bastien writes:
> I see something wrong right now: RET after a headline should only try
> to indent below the beginning of the headline with org-adapt-indentation
> is t, but not nil or headline-data.
>
> For now, when org-adapt-indentation is headline-data, RET still indents.
>
> I will see
Just to say that RET seems to be working again. No idea what happened
or changed, mind you... Sorry for the noise.
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.3-150-g6b83c6
On Sunday, 20 Dec 2020 at 18:25, Bastien wrote:
> I see something wrong right now: RET after a headline should only try
> to indent below the beginning of the headline with org-adapt-indentation
> is t, but not nil or headline-data.
Interesting. I have org-adapt-indentation set to nil as I use
Hi All,
On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 18:25, Bastien wrote:
>
> Also, I'm thinking of using headline-data as the new default for the
> org-adapt-indentation option. WDYT?
>
> I know Kevin as a good overview of the whole topic, maybe he can also
> advise about what should be done here.
I cannot but
Hi Eric,
Eric S Fraga writes:
> Just a quick heads-up:
>
> I have just installed org from git (a few hours ago) and now it seems
> that RET no longer indents. Is this intentional?
I've not closely followed this, sorry.
I see something wrong right now: RET after a headline should only try
to
Eric S Fraga writes:
> On Friday, 18 Dec 2020 at 20:12, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
>> I am using 9.4.2 from emacs-master. It is working fine there.
>
> I'm on 9.4.3...
Today, I have 9.4.3 from emacs-master. And the feature is working
perfectly fine in this as well C-j and RET, both working
> On Dec 18, 2020, at 5:06 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> Just a quick heads-up:
>
> I have just installed org from git (a few hours ago) and now it seems
> that RET no longer indents. Is this intentional?
>
> I know that there has been some discussion on the mailing list but I
> seem to have
On Friday, 18 Dec 2020 at 20:12, Pankaj Jangid wrote:
> I am using 9.4.2 from emacs-master. It is working fine there.
I'm on 9.4.3...
--
: Eric S Fraga via Emacs 28.0.50, Org release_9.4.3-150-g6b83c6
Eric S Fraga writes:
> I have just installed org from git (a few hours ago) and now it seems
> that RET no longer indents. Is this intentional?
>
> I know that there has been some discussion on the mailing list but I
> seem to have lost track of the decision, if any, taken. RET and C-j now
>
Just a quick heads-up:
I have just installed org from git (a few hours ago) and now it seems
that RET no longer indents. Is this intentional?
I know that there has been some discussion on the mailing list but I
seem to have lost track of the decision, if any, taken. RET and C-j now
behave the
17 matches
Mail list logo
