On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 3:32 AM Emmanuel Charpentier <
emm.charpent...@free.fr> wrote:
> Le mardi 20 juillet 2021 à 02:55 -0400, Matt Price a écrit :
>
> Certainly citation of personal communications is common in the fields of
> history and philosophy of science, where it represents an effort to
Am 20.07.2021 um 15:50 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:50 AM Denis Maier wrote:
This leads to problems with automatic citations, especially when you also use
"ibid." and such...
Bla [cite:@doe].
Blabla (Gen 1).
Bla [cite:@doe].
=>
Bla (Doe 2020).
Blabla (Gen 1).
Bla
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 8:50 AM Denis Maier wrote:
> > Certainly in the CSL world, this has never been supported, and I don't
> > ever recall it ever coming up (though I'm sure someone on the Zotero
> > forum raised it at some point)
>
> I'm pretty sure I've brought that up at some point :-)
Am 20.07.2021 um 13:41 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:48 PM John Kitchin wrote:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
In natbib there is \citetext{priv.\ comm.} which is used to add a
textual citation to the bibliography that doesn't have a key
John Kitchin writes:
> Who is to say why someone would bother. It is a command on page two
> of http://tug.ctan.org/macros/latex/contrib/natbib/natnotes.pdf that
> one can use.
Hmmm... but I would say that the natbib command \citetext is more a
helper/workaround for the missing prefix/suffix
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 8:48 PM John Kitchin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
> wrote:
>>
>> > In natbib there is \citetext{priv.\ comm.} which is used to add a
>> > textual citation to the bibliography that doesn't have a key
>> > associated with it.
>>
>>
Le mardi 20 juillet 2021 à 02:55 -0400, Matt Price a écrit :
> Certainly citation of personal communications is common in the fields
> of history and philosophy of science, where it represents an effort
> to responsibly represent the source of ideas owed to other persons.
I don't dispute that.
>
Le lundi 19 juillet 2021 à 20:47 -0400, John Kitchin a écrit :
[ Snip... ]
> It is also possible to use \nocite{*} as a cite, which includes all
> references from a bibliography, and yet contains no key.
Hence your reluctance to work from a set of larger databases, which
would include
Certainly citation of personal communications is common in the fields of
history and philosophy of science, where it represents an effort to
responsibly represent the source of ideas owed to other persons. It's not
really a question of whether you personally would do it; it's a question of
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 7:28 PM Emmanuel Charpentier <
emm.charpent...@free.fr> wrote:
> > In natbib there is \citetext{priv.\ comm.} which is used to add a
> > textual citation to the bibliography that doesn't have a key
> > associated with it.
>
> Hmmm... why should you bother to reference a
> In natbib there is \citetext{priv.\ comm.} which is used to add a
> textual citation to the bibliography that doesn't have a key
> associated with it.
Hmmm... why should you bother to reference a personal communication ?
Such private communications may be mentionned in the text (possibly by
a
In natbib there is \citetext{priv.\ comm.} which is used to add a textual
citation to the bibliography that doesn't have a key associated with it.
I don't see a way to get something like that in org-cite, since it seems
that a key is always required.
This isn't currently recognized as a cite,
12 matches
Mail list logo