That function inserts into a bibtex file, and if you don't save it then
the new entry is not "findable", so it is somewhat critical to do that
in my mind. It could make sense to check if there is a file attached to
the buffer though, and only save in that case. That would preserve the
current behav
On 09-04-2020 13:43, John Kitchin wrote:
> This is basically what doi-add-bibtex-entry does. There isn't one
> function that does arxiv too, but there is arxiv-add-bibtex-entry. Those
> are both commands in org-ref. These don't pop up a buffer for approval,
> that is something you would have to bui
Hello,
On 2020-04-09 15:43, John Kitchin writes:
> This is basically what doi-add-bibtex-entry does. There isn't one
> function that does arxiv too, but there is arxiv-add-bibtex-entry. Those
> are both commands in org-ref. These don't pop up a buffer for approval,
> that is something you would
This is basically what doi-add-bibtex-entry does. There isn't one
function that does arxiv too, but there is arxiv-add-bibtex-entry. Those
are both commands in org-ref. These don't pop up a buffer for approval,
that is something you would have to build yourself.
There are many workflows people wan
Hello John,
sorry for the cryptic subject but I was unable to come up with something
better. I am revamping my workflow to take notes about articles I read
or that I save to be read later and I decided to explore if org-ref and
the related utility packages fit what I would like to be able to do.
