Hi Matt,
Matt Huszagh writes:
> Thanks for the feedback. I've filled out the form you sent and sent it
> to the email listed.
this is now in master, thanks.
--
Bastien
Hi Matt,
Matt Huszagh writes:
> Thanks for the feedback. I've filled out the form you sent and sent it
> to the email listed.
Thanks! It looks good.
Let me know when you get the answer from the FSF.
If you don't in four weeks, please ping them again cc'ing me.
--
Bastien
Will do, thanks!
On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 5:10 PM Bastien wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> Matt Huszagh writes:
>
> > Thanks for the feedback. I've filled out the form you sent and sent it
> > to the email listed.
>
> Thanks! It looks good.
>
> Let me know when you get the answer from the FSF.
>
> If you
Thanks for the feedback. I've filled out the form you sent and sent it
to the email listed.
Adjusted patch below. I didn't add a value to the customization. I'm
honestly not very familiar with the customize interface since I never
use it. Is that a default value if the user selects string from
Hi Matt,
Matt Huszagh writes:
> From 056d23d9e5caa6fc22907014e0128519fcc84b6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Matt Huszagh
> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 18:42:11 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] add custom command option when converting latex fragments to
> html
>
> This allows you to set a custom
Matt Huszagh writes:
> Thanks for the reply. I’ll look into it. However, I’d initially ruled
> that out because the final output is meant to be an image. So, to get
> just text insertion into the html output I imagine would be a bit of
> a hack. For instance what to set image-converter to etc.
Bastien,
Thanks for the reply. I’ll look into it. However, I’d initially ruled that
out because the final output is meant to be an image. So, to get just text
insertion into the html output I imagine would be a bit of a hack. For
instance what to set image-converter to etc.
Matt
On Sun, Feb 16,
Hi Matt,
Matt Huszagh writes:
> The patch below allow's you to provide your own shell command the
> generates HTML from a latex fragment and places the output directly in
> the exported HTML file.
Can you get the same output by configuring a new symbol in
`org-preview-latex-process-alist' then
Hi all,
The patch below allow's you to provide your own shell command the
generates HTML from a latex fragment and places the output directly in
the exported HTML file.
I've added this feature to be able to use latexml for processing latex
fragments to HTML. Unfortunately, mathjax can't process