The manual I'm using is here:
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Working-With-Source-Code
See item 14.2.8.1
sub-heading: Emacs Lisp evaluation of variables
in the sample code,
#+begin_src sh :var file-name=(buffer-file-name) :exports both
wc -w $file
#+end_src
shouldn't
file-name=(buffer-file-name)
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM, skip scp0...@gmail.com wrote:
The manual I'm using is here:
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Working-With-Source-Code
See item 14.2.8.1
sub-heading: Emacs Lisp evaluation of variables
in the sample code,
#+begin_src sh :var file-name=(buffer-file-name) :exports
The info pages are a couple versions behind too.
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Noorul Islam wrote:
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 12:06 PM, skip scp0...@gmail.com wrote:
The manual I'm using is here:
http://orgmode.org/org.html#Working-With-Source-Code
See item 14.2.8.1
sub-heading: Emacs Lisp
Chao LU looc...@gmail.com writes:
First of all it's free, open resource. Its database file is just an
bibtex file, so all the records is in plain text, even the thumbnails
are stored inside this bibtex file. like below,
I do think that BibDesk has great features to investigate, such as
I wouldn't be writing this if the documentation were reasonable. Once
org-mode gets cloned, how is git properly used to update the cloned
instance on a machine?
Jude DaShiell jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:
I wouldn't be writing this if the documentation were reasonable. Once
org-mode gets cloned, how is git properly used to update the cloned
instance on a machine?
What's unreasonable about the doc?
If you don't have any local changes, see
Compare that documentation with the documentation written for
micro-emacs, that should give you an idea what I mean by reasonable
documentation. Also, thanks for the faq pointers.
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Nick Dokos wrote:
Jude DaShiell jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:
I wouldn't be writing
1) so we understand each other. My complaint has nothing to do with
org-mode's documentation and everything to do with the documentation
for git itself.On Sun, 5 Jun 2011, Pieter Praet wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:05:47 -0400 (EDT), Jude DaShiell
jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:
I
On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:26:54 -0400 (EDT), Jude DaShiell
jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:
1) so we understand each other. My complaint has nothing to do with
org-mode's documentation and everything to do with the documentation
for git itself. [...]
Oh, I see :D
So your query should have
Jude DaShiell jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:
Compare that documentation with the documentation written for
micro-emacs, that should give you an idea what I mean by reasonable
documentation. Also, thanks for the faq pointers.
and
1) so we understand each other. My complaint has nothing
The only place microemacs might be by now could be some orphan version of
the simtel archives. Taken down but last I knew not entirely removed from
the internet. On Sat, 4 Jun 2011, Nick Dokos wrote:
Jude DaShiell jdash...@shellworld.net wrote:
Compare that documentation with the
As I understand org - at least as of v7.4, the numeric values of
priorities as calculated in org-get-priority, are variable and based
on multiplying things by 1000.
I can understand why this is done this way, but it is a little restrictive.
I would like to suggest that the numeric values of
I do
(defun alpha-org-priority-score (optional sg)
(case (alpha-org-entry-priority-letter sg)
(?A 2)
(?B 0)
(?C -1)
(t (error Case exhausted for priority
--
The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
I support the Whittemore-Peterson Institute (WPI)
===
13 matches
Mail list logo
