Re: [O] MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory?

2012-08-12 Thread James Harkins
On Aug 12, 2012 12:29 PM, "Nick Dokos" wrote: > But from what you show below, you are not using cadaver (or anything > webdav-related for that matter) to do the copying. You are using > scp: *that*'s what you've got to get working. When configuring a new service, it's useful to conduct a minimal

Re: [O] [PATCH 07/10] org-taskjuggler: make project umbrella task optional

2012-08-12 Thread Yann Hodique
> "Christian" == Christian Egli writes: > Yann Hodique writes: >> +(defcustom org-export-taskjuggler-keep-project-as-task t >> + "Whether to keep the project headline as an umbrella task for >> + all declared tasks. Setting this to nil will allow maintaining >> + completely separated task

Re: [O] MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory?

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Hi James, James Harkins writes: > But the doc was rather misleading, suggesting that some editorial > attention would be warranted. Can you send a patch to fix the docs? Thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] Tangling is broken in git master

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Hi Bernt, Bernt Hansen writes: > Tangling doesn't work for me in git master anymore. Git bisect > identifies the following commit as introducing the problem Please try the attached patch and let us know if it works. Thanks, >From 45c517919756b7af78b720e454e8ea8d969f6a43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2

Re: [O] MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory?

2012-08-12 Thread James Harkins
On Aug 12, 2012 4:42 PM, "Bastien" wrote: > > But the doc was rather misleading, suggesting that some editorial > > attention would be warranted. > > Can you send a patch to fix the docs? I wouldn't mind doing so, but I haven't the foggiest how it's supposed to work. hjh

Re: [O] Latest version of Org-mode 7.8.3?

2012-08-12 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:46:32PM +0530, Jambunathan K wrote: > 'Mash writes: > > > M-x org-version > > Org-mode version 6.33x (release_7.8.11.409.ga3778) > > > > Am I missing something with the installation or repository? > > You are on 409 and I am on 414 i.e., Org.7.8.11-414.. Res

[O] refresh image?

2012-08-12 Thread Petro
Hi list. I there a faster way to refresh inline image than "C-c C-x C-v C-c C-x C-v"? Thanks. Petro

Re: [O] Latest version of Org-mode 7.8.3?

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Hi Suvayu, Suvayu Ali writes: > On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:46:32PM +0530, Jambunathan K wrote: >> 'Mash writes: >> >> > M-x org-version >> > Org-mode version 6.33x (release_7.8.11.409.ga3778) >> > >> > Am I missing something with the installation or repository? >> >> You are on 409

Re: [O] refresh image?

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Hi Petro, Petro writes: > I there a faster way to refresh inline image than "C-c C-x C-v C-c C-x > C-v"? Do you mean a "shorter keystroke" or a faster process? -- Bastien

Re: [O] Add the capture feature "%(sexp)" to org-feed

2012-08-12 Thread Michael Brand
Hi Bastien On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Bastien wrote: > Unless I miss something obvious, the current version returns exactly > the same thing than the one you propose -- can you double-check or let > me know what is wrong with the current solution? Your solution is wrong when there is a “%

Re: [O] Latest version of Org-mode 7.8.3?

2012-08-12 Thread Suvayu Ali
Hi Bastien, On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:16:03AM +0200, Bastien wrote: > Hi Suvayu, > > > Is the installation mixed with the bundled version? > > Certainly. > > > If that is the case, it needs to be fixed or > > the OP will have loads of problems in the future. > > Indeed... thanks for bringing

Re: [O] Add the capture feature "%(sexp)" to org-feed

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Hi Michael, Michael Brand writes: > Your solution is wrong when there is a “%” not immediately followed by > “(”: Argh, right. I applied your patch, thanks again for the detailed examples. -- Bastien

Re: [O] MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory?

2012-08-12 Thread James Harkins
At Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:29:20 -0400, Nick Dokos wrote: > This looks wrong - if you try it with scp from the command line, can > you copy a file to that destination? OK, I played a little more with scp and got closer -- I can copy a file from the command line: scp /home/[myuser]/tmp/afile.txt [use

Re: [O] MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory?

2012-08-12 Thread Nick Dokos
James Harkins wrote: > At Sun, 12 Aug 2012 00:29:20 -0400, > Nick Dokos wrote: > > This looks wrong - if you try it with scp from the command line, can > > you copy a file to that destination? > > OK, I played a little more with scp and got closer -- I can copy a file from > the command line: >

Re: [O] [GSoC] Org-sync v0.2

2012-08-12 Thread Waldemar Quevedo
Hello Aurélien, I just tried org-sync to fetch the issues from a project in github, this looks really useful! Not a big deal but I see that you have to set os-github-auth and call M-x os-import, os etc.. to use org-sync. Since the library is named org-sync, wouldn't it be better to base on the li

Re: [O] MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory?

2012-08-12 Thread Nick Dokos
James Harkins wrote: > On Aug 12, 2012 12:29 PM, "Nick Dokos" wrote: > > But from what you show below, you are not using cadaver (or anything > > webdav-related for that matter) to do the copying. You are using > > scp: *that*'s what you've got to get working. > > When configuring a new service

Re: [O] MobileOrg, webdav, correct use of org-mobile-directory?

2012-08-12 Thread Nick Dokos
Nick Dokos wrote: > > Also check the permissions on /var/www/mobileorg/web: in particular, you > might want to execute the following check (the check that > org-mobile-create-sumo-agenda does) in your *scratch* buffer: > > (file-writable-p "/scpc:nick@pierrot:/var/www/mobileorg/web/agendas.or

Re: [O] Org Build System (aka Makefile)

2012-08-12 Thread Achim Gratz
Bastien writes: > Please make the default "make" procedure display all warnings that the > user would see by compiling Emacs itself. That isn't even possible, you'd need to use Emacs' build system (which, btw gives inconsistent results for repeated compiles). > I know we disagree about this: you

Re: [O] Using org-mode as day planner

2012-08-12 Thread John Hendy
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Bastien wrote: > Hi John, > > John Hendy writes: > >> Date trees are the obvious way to be able to do this, but they don't >> have any of the neat search functionality that I know of. > > Can you describe the search functionality you would like for date-trees? > I

Re: [O] Org Build System (aka Makefile)

2012-08-12 Thread Samuel Wales
Wait, I must have missed something. Some warnings are not showing? I do something like make >output 2>&1 ; grep -i 'error\|warning' output. Good code has no warnings, I thought? Samuel -- The Kafka Pandemic: http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com

[O] problem with odt export, emacs 23.3.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

2012-08-12 Thread Fabio Rinaldi
I always had a problem in exporting org mode files to odt format and finally I have found the reason of the problem and a solution. I use org mode within emacs 23.3.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS (all tools standard distribution). The otd export elisp file is placed here: /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-m

Re: [O] [GSoC] Org-sync v0.2

2012-08-12 Thread Christopher Allan Webber
Hey Aurélien, This is *very* exciting. I'm definitely interested in using this for MediaGoblin if I can. Several thoughts after watching the video: - I tend to take notes and local subtasks on bugs. Is there any way to do that? - Does org-sync also pull down comments? - I'd like to pull

Re: [O] [GSoC] Org-sync v0.2

2012-08-12 Thread Suvayu Ali
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:09:31PM +0900, Waldemar Quevedo wrote: > > Not a big deal but I see that you have to set os-github-auth and call M-x > os-import, os etc.. > to use org-sync. Since the library is named org-sync, wouldn't it be better > to > base on the library name for these settings?

Re: [O] problem with odt export, emacs 23.3.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

2012-08-12 Thread Jambunathan K
Fabio Thanks for going through all this trouble. Please post an updated recipe so that others can benefit. Did you look at `org-odt-data-dir', `org-odt-schema-dir-list' and `org-odt-styles-dir-list'? You can solve the issue by any one of the following ways: 1. Copy the style and schema files

Re: [O] Org Build System (aka Makefile)

2012-08-12 Thread Eric Schulte
>> I know we disagree about this: you think that compiler warnings are for >> the developers, not for the users. I think the default "make" should >> send as much warnings as Emacs sends with its own default "make". > > You continue to misunderstand what I was saying or at least trying to > say.

[O] Fwd: Re: problem with odt export, emacs 23.3.1 on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS

2012-08-12 Thread Jambunathan K
(Forwarding to the list) > On 12 August 2012 20:40, Jambunathan K wrote: >> >> Fabio >> >> Thanks for going through all this trouble. Please post an updated >> recipe so that others can benefit. > > I think the problem should be dealt with by the maintainer > of the org-mode package in Ubuntu,

Re: [O] refresh image?

2012-08-12 Thread Petro
Bastien writes: > Hi Petro, > > Petro writes: > >> I there a faster way to refresh inline image than "C-c C-x C-v C-c C-x >> C-v"? > > Do you mean a "shorter keystroke" or a faster process? I mean a shorter keystroke.

[O] org-link minor mode

2012-08-12 Thread Sean O'Halpin
Hi, I've been hacking this weekend to try to create a minor mode that enables org-mode bracket links in modes other than org-mode. I believe this has been mooted before (e.g. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-08/msg00573.html). The following codes works for me but I'm sure it

[O] reevaluate all sorce code blocks?

2012-08-12 Thread Petro
Hi list It seems simple but I cannot find it in the manual. Is there a command to reevaluate all source code blocks in the current org-mode buffer? Thanks Petro

Re: [O] Org Build System (aka Makefile)

2012-08-12 Thread Achim Gratz
Eric Schulte writes: > But we certainly shouldn't (and currently aren't?) inhibit the display > of any warnings when the default make is run. I was surprised to run > make compile-source and see additional warnings which weren't shown > during regular make. These warnings aren't reliable — the by

Re: [O] reevaluate all sorce code blocks?

2012-08-12 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Aloha Petro, Petro writes: > Hi list > It seems simple but I cannot find it in the manual. > Is there a command to reevaluate all source code blocks in the current > org-mode buffer? > Thanks > Petro C-c C-v b or C-c C-v C-borg-babel-execute-buffer C-c C-v s or C-c C-v C-sorg-b

Re: [O] refresh image?

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Petro writes: > I mean a shorter keystroke. You can now (from latest git) use C-c C-x C-M-v -- Bastien

Re: [O] [PATCH 07/10] org-taskjuggler: make project umbrella task optional

2012-08-12 Thread Simon Thum
On 08/12/2012 10:03 AM, Yann Hodique wrote: "Christian" == Christian Egli writes: ... while the new (non-default) one would generate --8<---cut here---start->8--- project main Main {} task task1 "Task1" {} task task2 "Task2" {} --8<---cut here---

Re: [O] [PATCH 07/10] org-taskjuggler: make project umbrella task optional

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Simon Thum writes: > Bit I might go at this myself if your patches land, which look excellent > BTW. The patches will land as soon as we the copyright assignment is processed. Chances are that this will be after Org 7.9 though, but equal chances are that 7.9.1 will closely follow 7.9, so please

[O] make test on OSX

2012-08-12 Thread Neuwirth Erich
Enclosed is the output of make test with the current (see time spam of mail) version pulled from git. it contains the backtraces of the failed tests. I am running OSX 10.8 and Emacs 24.1.1 This is GNU Emacs 24.1.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin, NS apple-appkit-1038.36) of 2012-06-10 on bob.porkrind.org A

Re: [O] Org Build System (aka Makefile)

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Hi Achim, Achim Gratz writes: > You continue to misunderstand what I was saying or at least trying to > say. The primary function of Org's build system is to, well, build Org > with the minimum fuzz. That's what it was designed to do and that is > what it does — it can do other things as well,

Re: [O] Tangling is broken in git master

2012-08-12 Thread Bernt Hansen
Bastien writes: > Hi Bernt, > > Bernt Hansen writes: > >> Tangling doesn't work for me in git master anymore. Git bisect >> identifies the following commit as introducing the problem > > Please try the attached patch and let us know if it works. > > Thanks, That doesn't work. There's a missin

Re: [O] Tangling is broken in git master

2012-08-12 Thread Bernt Hansen
Achim Gratz writes: > Bernt Hansen writes: >> Tangling doesn't work for me in git master anymore. Git bisect >> identifies the following commit as introducing the problem > [...] >> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-function letrec) >> (letrec ((intersect ...)) (funcall intersect (case conte

Re: [O] make test on OSX

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Neuwirth Erich writes: > Any ideas why the tests are failing? It looks like there is a missing dependancy related to org-element somewhere. But I can't reproduce the problem, so it is hard to tell. -- Bastien

Re: [O] Org Build System (aka Makefile)

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
By the way, I just tried to compile with _COMPILE_ = source in default.mk (instead of _COMPILE_ = dirall, which I commented) and it seems to compile twice (as with "single+dirall") and it does not remove the *elc files, as advertized. Anything I miss here? Thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] Tangling is broken in git master

2012-08-12 Thread Bastien
Bernt Hansen writes: > That doesn't work. There's a missing ) at the end of the defalias and > after I add that I get Er, sorry for the typo. I've reverted this commit for now, I'll see if I can get rid of cl-labels another way. Thanks, -- Bastien

Re: [O] Org Build System (aka Makefile)

2012-08-12 Thread Achim Gratz
Bastien writes: > One thing I need to understand: what are the warnings that you have > when compiling within a single process and you don't when compiling > with one process per file? Emacs Lisp as a dynamic language has no concept of a "well-formed" program that can be verified by just looking a