You can color your own links like this:
(highlight-regexp cite:\\([a-zA-Z0-9]*[-_:]*\\)* 'dired-warning)
(highlight-regexp citenum:\\([a-zA-Z0-9]*[-_:]*\\)* 'dired-marked)
The regexps are not as robust as what org uses, the plain link on my
system looks like:
Consider the following org file:
* Tasks
** Ordered Tasks
:PROPERTIES:
:ORDERED: t
:END:
*** TODO Module 1
TODO Item 1
SCHEDULED: 2015-02-01 Sun
TODO Item 2
SCHEDULED: 2015-02-01 Sun
*** TODO Module 2
TODO Item 3
SCHEDULED: 2015-02-01 Sun
TODO Item 4
SCHEDULED: 2015-02-01 Sun
I'm glad you like Samuel's idea about extensible syntax for links. I
don't know if it is practical or not, but it was one of those ideas that
seemed right on when I first read it.
I am glad you mentioned, it was an inspiration! Although this is sure to
move away from a standard new syntax, it
Hi John,
Wow. It's inspiring to see Samuel's idea in action.
Presumably, something like this would also be possible?
;; follow function
(lambda (path)
(let* ((data (read (concat ( path
(head (car data))
(plist (cadr data)))
(funcall (plist-get plist :follow)
Thanks! I had been thinking about how to do that for a while, and seeing
Samuel's idea crytallized it for me. Thanks Samuel, and Tom for
remembering it from long ago.
yes that should also be possible. once you open the rabbit hole of
embedded lisp, many things are possible ;) even beyond
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
#+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :results silent
(org-add-link-type
slink ...)
#+END_SRC
Thanks John, this is great!
I managed to chop down my citation setup to the following:
[[cite:key :pre pre :post post :type type]]
with reasonable support for other
Hi Rasmus and all,
Thanks for your comments!
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
** Backend-agnostic formatting properties
*** Selecting specific fields
Selecting specific fields to display could be done by appending field
names to cite keys after colons, much like Org tags:
#+BEGIN_QUOTE
[See
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Samuel Loury konubi...@gmail.com writes:
Please find attached the merged patch, as asked for.
Applied, thank you.
Therefore, the hooks associated to the insertion of a heading will be
triggered. Since those hooks may cause the creation of
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
See cite:Doe1999 for an overview; a more extensive discussion is in
cite:Foobar2000
This is ok and supported by ox-bibtex.el.
if the pre/post text is really critical somehow, you can do this.
[[cite:Doe1999][See::for an overview]]; a more
Thomas S. Dye writes:
Aloha Richard,
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
My point is not that the link syntax *can't* do enough. Rather, my
point is that citations are conceptually distinct from links, and if we
are going to adopt an official syntax for them, that
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
2) There are at least several different backend reference database
formats (BibTeX, Zotero, etc.) used by Orgsters. Not all such databases
use human-readable keys. Org also has a nice internal format for
storing reference information:
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
You and others are advocating a separate syntax for links and citations,
which might indeed be the way to go. I can see it being much nicer than
the current state of affairs with Org mode links. The downside is that
it will mean learning another set of
Worth trying the buffer-invisibility-spec solution. I'd be interested to
know if it works or not. Although I wonder whether the commands that you
are using really should be obeying visibility context.
Phil
John Kitchin johnrkitc...@gmail.com writes:
yes, I meant programatically. I was having
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
You can skip the first lines of an INCLUDEd file with :line parameter.
You can also only include a section. See manual for details.
Thank you for the hint. I used something like
#+INCLUDE a.org :lines 3-
but still got duplicate keywords (the
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
Nicolas Goaziou m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr writes:
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
...so the first step for introducing citation syntax to Org should be
compiling a list of all the things such a syntax should
Hello!
Svjatoslav Agejenko svjatos...@svjatoslav.eu writes:
Button Show Org source on page
http://orgmode.org/worg/code/org-info-js/
does not work.
You could try the explicit
http://orgmode.org/worg/code/org-info-js/index.html instead. The
button's action depends on the concrete
Samuel Loury konubi...@gmail.com writes:
Please find attached the merged patch, as asked for.
Applied, thank you.
Therefore, the hooks associated to the insertion of a heading will be
triggered. Since those hooks may cause the creation of some
metadata. `org-end-of-meta-data' is used
Jarmo Hurri jarmo.hu...@syk.fi writes:
Yep, I am going to start doing this if no-one is working on it yet.
I woke up in the middle of the night to realize how amazingly easily
this can be done if I drop out the support for PDF export, that is,
only leave the option to export as HTML. There
Hello,
Stefan Nobis stefan...@snobis.de writes:
Maybe it would be a helful extension to give #+INCLUDE an option to
just ignore global settings?
You can skip the first lines of an INCLUDEd file with :line parameter.
You can also only include a section. See manual for details.
Regards,
--
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 at 10:02:41 PST,
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi all,
Here is the citation syntax proposal I have mentioned in a couple of
posts now. I have attached it as an Org document for better
readability, and also reproduced the text below. Let me know
In particular (comparing the org-plus-contrib-20150202 package against today's
http://orgmode.org/cgit.cgi/org-mode.git/tree/contrib/lisp):
htmlize.el
ob-stata.el
org-colview-xemacs.el (not that I really care about this one)
org-download.el
org-ebib.el
org-effectiveness.el
org-eldoc.el
org
Hi Erik and all,
Erik Hetzner e...@e6h.org writes:
I am really, really glad to see people discussing citations in
org-mode. But I have some concerns about this proposal.
Before extensions are proposed to the pandoc format, I think it is
important to understand how flexible the combination
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:23:25PM -0600, Bill White wrote:
Today I was looking for a tool to ease my transcription of a recording
of a half-hour appointment with a doctor.
Googling led to https://transcribe.wreally.com/ for the job - it really
works well, and it seems like something orgmode
Greetings,
Entering bug results in References: [ bug: 0 ]
No document matching your query..
Entering +subject:bug results in References: [ (Too many documents hit.
Ignored) ]
No document matching your query.
So, I'm at a loss on how I can tell if someone has already reported my issue
or
Today I was looking for a tool to ease my transcription of a recording
of a half-hour appointment with a doctor.
Googling led to https://transcribe.wreally.com/ for the job - it really
works well, and it seems like something orgmode should be able to do.
The idea is to unite a media player with
Org-ref is very functional and has so far been able to deal with much of my
needs. So, I just hope we are not trying to fix something that is not broken.
The real need in the context of citations is to somehow extend the
bibtex/biblatex integration to other export formats (odt/html, most
I have a key which calls `gnus-other-frame`, a handy function that not only
pops up a gnus frame, but also kills the frame when I exit gnus. I'd like
something similar with my org agenda; the following function is used to pop it
up, but I'm not sure how to kill the frame when I hit close the
I have very little of substance to say, but many thanks to Richard for
raising the level of discourse to a much more sophisticated one than I was
able to achieve in my initial post.
I don't feel qualified to comment on whether links or a new citation syntax
is appropriate. But I do think that
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 at 10:26:05 PST,
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi all,
[…]
As I mentioned in the earlier thread, I think the Pandoc syntax is a
good place to start, and I think it would be valuable to have the two
syntaxes be compatible. But even Pandoc's
Hi Richard,
On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 at 20:41:06 PST,
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu wrote:
Hi Erik and all,
Actually, I totally agree. For my own use, I would be completely happy
with just using the Pandoc syntax for citations in Org, without any
modifications.
Great!
The
t...@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
You and others are advocating a separate syntax for links and citations,
which might indeed be the way to go. I can see it being much nicer than
the current state of affairs with Org mode links. The downside is that
it will mean learning another set of
torys.ander...@gmail.com (Tory S. Anderson) wrote:
I have a key which calls `gnus-other-frame`, a handy function that not
only pops up a gnus frame, but also kills the frame when I exit
gnus. I'd like something similar with my org agenda; the following
function is used to pop it up, but I'm
Hi John,
John Kitchin jkitc...@andrew.cmu.edu writes:
Now, I agree with you that Org mode links are not ideal for citations.
Parsing the description is humbug and error-prone, and the descriptions
look ungainly in the Org mode document. I never remember to click
citation links in the right
Hi,
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
Hi Rasmus and all,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
Within a citation, each reference to an individual work needs to be
capable of containing:
1) a database key that
Hi,
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
Here is the citation syntax proposal I have mentioned in a couple of
posts now.
Thanks. I think it's a good start, but I find it too far away from Org in
some respects. Hence comments follow.
** Backend-agnostic formatting
Hello,
Gregor Zattler g...@gmx.de writes:
Dear org-mode developers,
adding a date to the datetree in the org-agenda-diary-file
produces a mess:
- emacs-snapshot -Q -L /home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/ -nw –eval (setq
org-agenda-diary-file /tmp/diary.org)
- Mx org-agenda
- a
- i
- d
-
Hello,
Gregor Zattler telegr...@gmx.net writes:
Dear org-mode developers,
from the agenda I want to add an entry to the diary. When I do
emacs24 -Q -nw
M-x org-mode
M-x org-agenda
a
i
d
I get:
Diary entry: [d]ay [w]eekly [m]onthly [y]early [a]nniversary [b]lock [c]yclic
Hi Rasmus and all,
Rasmus ras...@gmx.us writes:
Richard Lawrence richard.lawre...@berkeley.edu writes:
Within a citation, each reference to an individual work needs to be
capable of containing:
1) a database key that references the cited work
2) prefix / pre-text
3) suffix /
Hi all,
Here is the citation syntax proposal I have mentioned in a couple of
posts now. I have attached it as an Org document for better
readability, and also reproduced the text below. Let me know what you
think!
Best,
Richard
#+TITLE: A Proposal for Org citation syntax
#+AUTHOR: Richard
Hello,
You should have a look at EMMS. It's suite easy to setup on linux. But if
you are using a MS Windows OS, it does requiert more settings. But
everything you light ne controlable within Emacs.
Regards,
Basile
Le 3 févr. 2015 06:27, Russell Adams rlad...@adamsinfoserv.com a écrit :
On
40 matches
Mail list logo
